Automated novelty detection in the WISE survey with one-class support vector machines

Abstract

Wide-angle photometric surveys of previously uncharted sky areas or wavelength regimes will always bring in unexpected sourcesnovelties or even anomalies -whose existence and properties cannot be easily predicted from earlier observations. Such objects can be efficiently located with novelty detection algorithms. Here we present an application of such a method, called one-class support vector machines (OCSVM), to search for anomalous patterns among sources preselected from the mid-infrared AllWISE catalogue covering the whole sky. To create a model of expected data we train the algorithm on a set of objects with spectroscopic identifications from the SDSS DR13 database, present also in AllWISE. The OCSVM method detects as anomalous those sources whose patterns -WISE photometric measurements in this case -are inconsistent with the model. Among the detected anomalies we find artefacts, such as objects with spurious photometry due to blending, but more importantly also real sources of genuine astrophysical interest. Among the latter, OCSVM has identified a sample of heavily reddened AGN/quasar candidates distributed uniformly over the sky and in a large part absent from other WISE-based AGN catalogues. It also allowed us to find a specific group of sources of mixed types, mostly stars and compact galaxies. By combining the semi-supervised OCSVM algorithm with standard classification methods it will be possible to improve the latter by accounting for sources which are not present in the training sample, but are otherwise well-represented in the target set. Anomaly detection adds flexibility to automated source separation procedures and helps verify the reliability and representativeness of the training samples. It should be thus considered as an essential step in supervised classification schemes to ensure completeness and purity of produced catalogues.

Catalogue of new Herbig Ae/Be and classical Be stars

“…The red arrow indicates that the Archival data is partially contained within the Sample of Study, but was also constructed using external information like the Hα EWs. Solarz et al 2017;Ksoll et al 2018), or artificial neural networks (Snider et al 2001;Hampton et al 2017). However, similar performances are achieved with most of the algorithms and it is evident that the output is mainly dominated by the quality of the training data (Pérez-Ortiz et al 2017;Pashchenko et al 2018, or Marton et al 2019 in a similar problem of identifying YSOs).…”

Deep transfer learning for star cluster classification: I. application to the PHANGS–HST survey

“…Some of these machine learning algorithms have been integrated into widely-used methods for image processing, such as the neural networks trained for star/galaxy separation in the automated source detection and photometry software SEXTRACTOR (Bertin & Arnouts 1996). Other applications of machine learning for image classification include the use of so-called decision trees (Weir et al 1995;Suchkov et al 2005;Ball et al 2006;Vasconcellos et al 2011;Sevilla-Noarbe & Etayo-Sotos 2015) and support vector machines (Fadely et al 2012;Solarz et al 2017;Ma lek & et al 2013).…”

Rare Object Search From Low-S/N Stellar Spectra in SDSS

“…However, one-class SVM is suitable for data with a handful of features, so it can be only applied to derived features of astronomical observations such as images, light-curves, or spectra. In addition, the kernel shape and free parameters need to be chosen for the resulting decision function [20], [38], [39]. Random Forest is trained to predict the class of previously unseen objects according to the classification probability [21].…”