Automated Optimization of JPEG 2000 Encoder Options Based on Model Observer Performance for Detecting Variable Signals in X-Ray Coronary Angiograms

Abstract

Image compression is indispensable in medical applications where inherently large volumes of digitized images are presented. JPEG 2000 has recently been proposed as a new image compression standard. The present recommendations on the choice of JPEG 2000 encoder options were based on nontask-based metrics of image quality applied to nonmedical images. We used the performance of a model observer [non-prewhitening matched filter with an eye filter (NPWE)] in a visual detection task of varying signals [signal known exactly but variable (SKEV)] in X-ray coronary angiograms to optimize JPEG 2000 encoder options through a genetic algorithm procedure. We also obtained the performance of other model observers (Hotelling, Laguerre-Gauss Hotelling, channelized-Hotelling) and human observers to evaluate the validity of the NPWE optimized JPEG 2000 encoder settings. Compared to the default JPEG 2000 encoder settings, the NPWE-optimized encoder settings improved the detection performance of humans and the other three model observers for an SKEV task. In addition, the performance also was improved for a more clinically realistic task where the signal varied from image to image but was not known a priori to observers [signal known statistically (SKS)]. The highest performance improvement for humans was at a high compression ratio (e.g., 30:1) which resulted in approximately a 75% improvement for both the SKEV and SKS tasks.

Mass detection in breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a model observer study

“…In the NPW with an eye filter (NPWE) model, the signal is thus filtered by the CSF, selectively suppressing or enhancing its frequency content in order to model human eye perception. This model has been successfully applied to predict human results for detecting synthetic thrombus embedded on x ray coronary angiograms ], spherical nodules or digitized masses ] embedded on mammograms, as well as for studying medical images compression algorithms [Suryanarayanan, 2005;Zhang, 2004a, b].…”

The Current Role of Image Compression Standards in Medical Imaging

“…For human observers, measuring such performance through psychophysical studies for the large variety of tasks and data present in medical imaging applications is time-consuming and expensive. Although model observers for task-based image quality assessment have been proposed [122,123], incorporation of these model observers into compression pipelines are usually designed for individual medical imaging modalities and has not been studied extensively except in a few isolated cases [124,125]. Therefore, objective performance metrics have often been used in image compression literature, although it is understood that these metrics, while relatively simple to compute, are only loosely correlated with diagnostic performance.…”

Computational and human observer image quality evaluation of low dose, knowledge‐based CT iterative reconstruction

“…38,39 Early reports in the vision science literature suggest two approaches for including internal noise: additive constant 40,41 and signal-dependent multiplicative 42,43 (or proportional 44 ) noise. These internal noise models have been added to the CHO in medical imaging to find detection thresholds in x-ray mammography, 45 optimize JPEG compression settings in coronary angiograms, 46,47 and optimize cardiac SPECT reconstruction parameters. 48,49 There are a number of considerations regarding the CHO and internal noise modeling.…”