33rd AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit 2003
DOI: 10.2514/6.2003-3879
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated Optimization of Supersonic Missile Performances Taking into Account Design Uncertainties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although it is customary in multi-disciplinary design optimisation to represent a system as a set of connected components that exchange information through connecting links (see [32] for an example of multi-disciplinary optimisation under uncertainty with Evidence Theory) in an ENM the specific properties of the nodes and the form in which they exchange information is such that Belief functions can be computed in polynomial time. The properties of an ENM and the difference with respect to common MDO [33,34] formulations will be explained in Sec. 6.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it is customary in multi-disciplinary design optimisation to represent a system as a set of connected components that exchange information through connecting links (see [32] for an example of multi-disciplinary optimisation under uncertainty with Evidence Theory) in an ENM the specific properties of the nodes and the form in which they exchange information is such that Belief functions can be computed in polynomial time. The properties of an ENM and the difference with respect to common MDO [33,34] formulations will be explained in Sec. 6.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%