2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2020.06.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated parallel derivatization of metabolites with SWATH-MS data acquisition for qualitative and quantitative analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such acquisition methods referred to as data independent acquisition (DIA) including the SWATH (accounting for Sequential Window Acquisition of all Theoretical fragment-ion spectra) approach are being increasingly used in metabolomics by enabling simultaneous metabolite identification and quantification through the acquisition of MS/MS spectra for all analytes in a single run [131,132]. Although slightly less sensitive than traditional LC-HRMS or MRM approaches, recent publications highlighted the potential of SWATH approaches for unambiguous compound detection and accurate quantification in complex samples [133][134][135][136]. With constant instrumental improvements (e.g., data acquisition speed on Orbitrap mass analyzers, in collision e n e r g i e s m a n a g e m e n t , se n s i t i v i t y , MS 2 spectra deconvolution), one can imagine great potential of such approach for future biological metabolomics applications.…”
Section: Analytical Validation Of Biomarker Candidates Highlighted By Untargeted Metabolomics: the Need For Targeted Quantitative Metabolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such acquisition methods referred to as data independent acquisition (DIA) including the SWATH (accounting for Sequential Window Acquisition of all Theoretical fragment-ion spectra) approach are being increasingly used in metabolomics by enabling simultaneous metabolite identification and quantification through the acquisition of MS/MS spectra for all analytes in a single run [131,132]. Although slightly less sensitive than traditional LC-HRMS or MRM approaches, recent publications highlighted the potential of SWATH approaches for unambiguous compound detection and accurate quantification in complex samples [133][134][135][136]. With constant instrumental improvements (e.g., data acquisition speed on Orbitrap mass analyzers, in collision e n e r g i e s m a n a g e m e n t , se n s i t i v i t y , MS 2 spectra deconvolution), one can imagine great potential of such approach for future biological metabolomics applications.…”
Section: Analytical Validation Of Biomarker Candidates Highlighted By Untargeted Metabolomics: the Need For Targeted Quantitative Metabolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We performed proteolytic stability studies in human blood serum to investigate whether the introduction of urea bonds affected the half-lives of compounds from each of synthesized group of hybrids. Compounds 3, 6 and 7 were incubated with human serum at 37 • C. Samples were taken at different time intervals and analyzed using LC-SWATH-MS [88][89][90]. Identified cleavage sites were compared with the degradation of the parent peptide, which exhibited a half-life of 8 h. Hybrids 6 and 7 were stable toward enzymatic degradation, with 50% of each compound still being intact after 96 h (Figure 5).…”
Section: In Vitro Enzymatic Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various methods of solvent extractions or derivatizations were developed to handle a diverse set of metabolites of different polarities and chemical properties. [ 11–13 ] Mixtures of acetonitrile, methanol and water are often used for extraction of more polar metabolites. For instance, a mixture of 40:40:20 (v/v/v) acetonitrile:methanol:water with 0.1 m formic acid, followed by addition of bicarbonate was applied to harvest high‐energy compounds like NADPH and ATP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 16,18 ] Derivatization methods were also extensively used to enhance the ionization efficiency of compounds of limiting endogenous abundance, high chemical instability, or low‐ionization efficiency. [ 11–13,19 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%