2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated Perimetry and Visual Dysfunction in Blast-Related Traumatic Brain Injury

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SITA tests often are used to identify and follow patients with field loss from diseases other than glaucoma, [31][32][33] and therefore one could consider the lack of inclusion of patients with such diseases as a weakness. This certainly was the case also when the early clinical studies of the SITA Standard and SITA Fast tests were published.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…SITA tests often are used to identify and follow patients with field loss from diseases other than glaucoma, [31][32][33] and therefore one could consider the lack of inclusion of patients with such diseases as a weakness. This certainly was the case also when the early clinical studies of the SITA Standard and SITA Fast tests were published.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[23][24][25] Despite these test time reductions, SITA test programs identified at least as much glaucomatous field loss 22,[26][27][28] as the algorithms that they replaced, and the SITA testing strategies enjoyed broad acceptance. [29][30][31][32][33] Over the last 15 years, results from large randomized glaucoma trials have changed our sense of what constitutes optimal glaucoma management. It has become clear that many or perhaps even most glaucomatous eyes progress, even in patients where measured intraocular pressures always are within statistically normal limits, and that rates of progression vary tremendously among eyes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have characterized many of the physical features of our blast protocol (including a pressure/time profile, overpressure, positive phase and duration) [83], which will help the comparison of these studies to other models of blast-mediated and non-blast mediated TBI. It should be noted that the visual and cognitive dysfunction we have previously reported using our model [11,12,13,84] is bilateral, suggesting a lack of effect from blunt impacts, and these same dysfunctions are frequently observed in Soldiers and Veterans exposed to blast injury [37,38,42,43,85,86]. This study also only focused on a single brain region, whereas past studies have focused globally on the brain or brain-connected fluids [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…We have utilized novel proteomics-based qualitative approaches to identify candidates for serum-based biomarkers of TBI. We focused our study on the thalamus, as it is a major sensory relay station in the brain, and previous findings of both auditory and visual difficulties have been observed in humans following blast-mediated TBI [37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44]. Thus, the thalamus may be a site particularly prone to damage and appropriate for developing biomarkers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 High rates of visual field deficits were demonstrated on reliable automated perimetry testing in veterans with blastrelated TBI of various severities. 8 An increasing number of veterans from recent military conflicts abroad have been diagnosed with mTBI and visual pathway trauma, especially ITON. Data on the epidemiology and natural history of visual pathway trauma in the military are currently being collected from The Defense and Veterans Eye Injury and Vision Registry, a registry for traumatic optic neuropathy that collects longitudinal clinical data on active duty service members and veterans with traumatic visual dysfunction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%