2021
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2020.3032664
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated Platform for Microseismic Signal Analysis: Denoising, Detection, and Classification in Slope Stability Studies

Abstract: Microseismic monitoring has been increasingly used in the past two decades to illuminate (sub)surface processes such as landslides, due to its ability to record small seismic waves generated by soil movement and/or brittle behaviour of rock. Understanding the evolution of landslide processes is of paramount importance in predicting or even avoiding an imminent failure. Microseismic monitoring recordings are often continuous, noisy and consist of signals emitted by various sources. Manually detecting and distin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Next, similar to [ 11 ], Neyman–Pearson lemma removes the stacked signals that most likely contain only background noise with low SNR. After concatenating the remaining consecutive windows, we form new windows .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Next, similar to [ 11 ], Neyman–Pearson lemma removes the stacked signals that most likely contain only background noise with low SNR. After concatenating the remaining consecutive windows, we form new windows .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the detected signals from continuous multi-channel recordings, it is necessary to develop interpretable and effective feature engineering for event classification. The main challenges in classifying seismic signals are: (1) lack of open access annotated datasets [ 11 ]; (2) imbalanced catalog of labeled events, caused by the sparsity of events of interest [ 11 ]; (3) high similarities between unknown natural and anthropogenic “interfering” signals and events of interest in time and/or frequency domain [ 12 ]. Feature engineering is a key step towards efficient signal classification as a large set of features with redundant information could easily increase the processing time and cause classifier overfitting, multicollinearity, and suboptimal feature ranking at the selection stage [ 2 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2), we use morphological image analysis to construct features and Graph Laplacian Regularisation (GLR)-based label propagation, as advanced semi-supervised classifier. This has been shown to perform well when the number of labelled samples is low and dataset is noisy [11], [12].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classification via Graph Laplacian Regularisation (GLR) has been widely used to classify image and time-series signals, especially when the number of labelled signals that can be used for training is small [10], [11]. In this paper, we use normalised GLR (identified in [12] as the best performing semi-supervised regularisation on graphs classification method for seismic signals), to identify the time slices which contain information about the real targets in order to reduce the false alarm rate and locate the real targets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%