1994
DOI: 10.1016/0924-2716(94)90034-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated radar image matching experiment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Up until now, two main approaches have been used for the estimation of ground deformation with remotely sensed data: image matching for all types of remotely sensed data (Erten et al, 2009;Evans, 2000;Leberl and Maurice, 1994;Sarti et al, 2006;Strozzi et al, 2002), and interferometric techniques using SAR data (Hanssen, 2001;Bamler and Hartl, 1998). Intensity-based matching approaches define the displacement as the shift that yields the best fit between different images in time and they are not limited by phase stability problems and can be reliably acquired on a regular basis but the object-dependent phase information is not taken into account.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up until now, two main approaches have been used for the estimation of ground deformation with remotely sensed data: image matching for all types of remotely sensed data (Erten et al, 2009;Evans, 2000;Leberl and Maurice, 1994;Sarti et al, 2006;Strozzi et al, 2002), and interferometric techniques using SAR data (Hanssen, 2001;Bamler and Hartl, 1998). Intensity-based matching approaches define the displacement as the shift that yields the best fit between different images in time and they are not limited by phase stability problems and can be reliably acquired on a regular basis but the object-dependent phase information is not taken into account.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the human operators, an automatic correlation method such as a normalized cross-correlation measure, can generate relative measuring deviations of 2 pixels according to [12]. The optimized pyramid image correlation strategy employing a least squares algorithm with a region-growing approach ensures that subpixel correlation can be achieved.…”
Section: B Theoretical Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first methods developments served the 3D mapping of the surface of planet Venus by processing SAR images acquired by the Magellan Mission (NASA). In (Leberl et al, 1994), the authors compare the quality of several intensity-based matching methods used for the Venus processing. Since then, several approaches have been implemented on higher resolution SAR imagery, principally for determining DEM of mountainous area (e.g., Fayard et al, 2007), canopy heights (e.g., Perko et al, 2011), or DEMs of glacier regions (Toutin et al, 2013).…”
Section: State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 99%