1991
DOI: 10.1115/1.2896360
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated Robotic Deburring of Parts Using Compliance Control

Abstract: This work presents a method for robotic deburring of two-dimensional planar parts with unknown geometry. Robotic deburring requires “compliancy” and “stiffness” in the robot in the directions tangent and normal to the part, respectively. Compliancy in the tangential direction allows robotic accommodation of tangential cutting forces, while stiffness in the normal direction impedes a robotic response to normal cutting forces. But, to track the part contour, the robot requires compliancy in the normal direction.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It shows that the cutting force in tangential direction varies with the burr size, while the force in normal direction maintains almost constant regardless of the burr size when the burrs are relatively small and uniform [1,2]. A consistent chamfer therefore can be obtained the control of the constant normal force.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…It shows that the cutting force in tangential direction varies with the burr size, while the force in normal direction maintains almost constant regardless of the burr size when the burrs are relatively small and uniform [1,2]. A consistent chamfer therefore can be obtained the control of the constant normal force.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…For example, polishing robots and finishing robots were presented in [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9], and automated robotic deburring and grinding were also shown in [10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. In [1,2], a furniture polishing robot which can run following cutter location data (CL data) was proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, polishing robots and finishing robots were presented in [3][4][5][6][7], and automated robotic deburring and grinding were also shown in [8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. In [6], a dynamic model that describes the dynamic behavior of the robot for surface finishing tasks is developed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%