SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2017 2017
DOI: 10.1190/segam2017-17739151.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated salt interpretation: Part 2 — Smooth surface wrapping of volume attribute

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most straightforward method could be to use the salt indicator function proposed by Wu [2016] and to define the three different categories by thresholding it. As an example, Haukås et al [2017] use this type of approach. If enough data points are available (either lithological or boundary observations), it is also possible to consider building the uncertainty envelope directly from these data, using for example the method proposed by Martin and Boisvert [2017].…”
Section: Generation Of the Uncertainty Envelope And Influence On The mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most straightforward method could be to use the salt indicator function proposed by Wu [2016] and to define the three different categories by thresholding it. As an example, Haukås et al [2017] use this type of approach. If enough data points are available (either lithological or boundary observations), it is also possible to consider building the uncertainty envelope directly from these data, using for example the method proposed by Martin and Boisvert [2017].…”
Section: Generation Of the Uncertainty Envelope And Influence On The mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most authors also propose to integrate manually picked information to guide the interpretation, either directly [e.g., Wu, 2016] or during the training phase for methods relying on classification algorithms [e.g., Berthelot et al, 2013, Di et al, 2018, Waldeland et al, 2018, Shi et al, 2019. Finally, Haukås et al [2017] propose an interesting approach to avoid overinterpreting seismic images: they extract surface patches only in well-defined boundary zones, and then smoothly connect the patches in the poorly resolved image parts. Such approach remains, however, deterministic as one single interpretation is produced in the end.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wu (2016) proposes to take into account manually picked samples to guide the interpretation in complicated zones. Haukås et al (2017) extract surface patches in the well-defined boundary zones and then connect the different patches by classifying the seismic data into "salt", "sediments", and "uncertain" and extrapolating the surface patches in the "uncertain" region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we propose a first general workflow that aims at generating different possible models of salt top surfaces from seismic images. As Haukås et al (2017), we partition the seismic volume into "salt", "sediments" and "uncertain" to determine the zone that contains the salt boundary. We then use a perturbed distance-based method to generate different top salt surfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%