“…Validity was evaluated in 14 studies and was based on a comparison to a second instrument. Five were classified as adequate (contact planimetry: n = 3; 2D DIAS: n = 2), while 8 studies (57%) received an inadequate score (Aydin et al, 2007; Toh et al, 2018; Uitentuis et al, 2020; Van Geel et al, 2004; van Geel, Vandendriessche, et al, 2019) (Hayashi et al, 2016; Kanthraj et al, 1997; Khatibi et al, 2021; Kislal & Halasz, 2013; Kohli et al, 2015; Marrakchi et al, 2008; Nugroho et al, 2013; Sheth et al, 2015). Inadequate ratings were due to low statistical evidence and/or weak reliability of the comparator (no measurement properties evaluated for the comparison instrument).…”