Automated Shape and Process Parameter Optimization for Scaling Up Geometrically Non-Similar Bioreactors

Abstract

Scaling bioprocesses remains a major challenge. Since it is physically impossible to increase all process parameters equally, a suitable scale-up strategy must be selected for a successful bioprocess. One of the most widely used criteria when scaling up bioprocesses is the specific power input. However, this represents only an average value. This study aims to determine the Kolmogorov length scale distribution by means of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and to use it as an alternative scale-up criterion for geometrically non-similar bioreactors for the first time. In order to obtain a comparable Kolmogorov length scale distribution, an automated geometry and process parameter optimization was carried out using the open-source tools OpenFOAM and DAKOTA. The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test statistic was used for optimization. A HEK293-F cell expansion (batch mode) from benchtop (Infors Minifors 2 with 4 L working volume) to pilot scale (D-DCU from Sartorius with 30 L working volume) was carried out. As a reference cultivation, the classical scale-up approach with constant specific power input (233 W m−3) was used, where a maximum viable cell density (VCDmax) of 5.02·106 cells mL−1 was achieved (VCDmax at laboratory scale 5.77·106 cells mL−1). Through the automated optimization of the stirrer geometry (three parameters), position and speed, comparable cultivation results were achieved as in the small scale with a maximum VCD of 5.60·106 cells mL−1. In addition, even on the pilot scale, cell aggregate size distribution was seen to strictly follow a geometric distribution and can be predicted with the help of CFD with the previously published correlation.

Bioreactor Systems for Plant Cell Cultivation at the Institute of Plant Physiology of the Russian Academy of Sciences: 50 Years of Technology Evolution from Laboratory to Industrial Implications

“…The level of biomass and secondary metabolite accumulation was notably affected by bioreactors' technical characteristics, such as the design, aeration, and mixing intensity, as well as their cultivation conditions (media composition, inoculum, etc.). This is consistent with the literature data [52,54,56,164,[176][177][178] on the lack of uniform and comprehensive scaling criteria for geometrically and structurally dissimilar bioreactor systems. Much of the success depended on the ability of the cells to adapt to the stress caused by bioreactor cultivation.…”