2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2021.104022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated site-specific assessment of steel structures through integrating machine learning and fracture mechanics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, the fatigue life of welded joints is the sum of the stages of crack initiation and crack growth, and the FCGR is difficult to accurately describe the complete fatigue cycle. [ 173 ] In addition, the FCGR can be expressed by a certain formula, while the data‐driven method is a blackbox model, which is difficult to interpret the predicted results in detail. Therefore, the researchers turn their attention to the fatigue life prediction of welded joints gradually.…”
Section: Progress In Prediction Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the fatigue life of welded joints is the sum of the stages of crack initiation and crack growth, and the FCGR is difficult to accurately describe the complete fatigue cycle. [ 173 ] In addition, the FCGR can be expressed by a certain formula, while the data‐driven method is a blackbox model, which is difficult to interpret the predicted results in detail. Therefore, the researchers turn their attention to the fatigue life prediction of welded joints gradually.…”
Section: Progress In Prediction Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Images of such graphs can be recognized by means of (1) support vectors and (2) clustering the most relevant damage identifiers using the algorithm of the K-nearest neighbors. Work [12] elaborates on analyzing damage in steel structures. Cracks are identified by applying a stress intensity factor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Structural health monitoring (SHM) is evolving and encompassing novel, nondestructive and computational techniques such as machine learning. Using ML provides a safe, reliable, and sustainable assessment of the operational health and working conditions of engineering structures [1,2]. The SHM considers key elements: data curation and management, system identification and analysis, condition assessment and monitoring, and decision making or maintenance [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the novel machine learning-based tools provide a data-driven, automated, non-contact, and robust structural health assessment. Therefore, ML-based methods are considered time-saving, cost-effective, and sustainable means for SHM [2][3][4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%