2018 IEEE International Symposium on Signal Processing and Information Technology (ISSPIT) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/isspit.2018.8642686
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated Staging of Diabetic Retinopathy Using a 2D Convolutional Neural Network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Shaban et al classified 4 different DR stages with the CNN model they designed. The study achieved an accuracy of 80.2% and a sensitivity of 78.7% [7].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Shaban et al classified 4 different DR stages with the CNN model they designed. The study achieved an accuracy of 80.2% and a sensitivity of 78.7% [7].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The modeling has been implemented over the Kaggle dataset, which has large fundus images where the outcome shows better accuracy. Adoption of CNN was also reported in Shaban et al [35], where multiclass classification of diabetic retinopathy is carried out for four different stages.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…However, the classification process can be further improved if more appropriate features are extracted in due processing and analysis steps. The proposed scheme has adopted the Kaggle eye dataset [35], which consists of a higher number of fundus retinal images characterized by higher resolution. The presented method of classification makes use of CNN to perform the determination of variable states of diabetic retinopathy.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine learning techniques have been used in DR detection and classification [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. Acharya et al introduced an automated diagnosis method using SVM classifier to identify normal, mild DR, moderate DR, severe DR, and prolific DR [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, Shaban et al introduced a CNN trained on 101 fundus images that can accurately identify the four stages of the disease (i.e. non-DR, NPDR, severe NPDR and PDR) [8]. A leave-one-out approach was used for testing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%