2020 7th International Conference on Information Science and Control Engineering (ICISCE) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/icisce50968.2020.00341
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated Surface Defects Detection on Mirrorlike Materials by using Faster R-CNN

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Defects like breaks, cracks, pinholes, dirt, pits, and spots, shown in [40], are repeated in this material; therefore, they can be used as a guide for future studies. The datasets have not been released because we work with factories, so the information is kept private.…”
Section: Ceramicmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Defects like breaks, cracks, pinholes, dirt, pits, and spots, shown in [40], are repeated in this material; therefore, they can be used as a guide for future studies. The datasets have not been released because we work with factories, so the information is kept private.…”
Section: Ceramicmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Min et al [32] proposed the use of CNNs (ResNet20, ResNet56, and ResNet110) in defect detection for ceramic images with data augmentation. Karangwa et al [40] present a proposal for surface defect detection based on a Faster R-CNN with VGG16. However, with custom CNNs, Birlutiu et al [82] presented an automated defect management system with real-time high-speed processing to classify and predict images with and without defects.…”
Section: Ceramicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[23] comprehensively compared the performance of CNN, SAE, MP and SVM-RBF based on the data set of wafer surface defects, and concluded that CNN was superior to other models, and further proposed an automatic defect classification system based on CNN. As traditional defect detection methods rely on manual extraction and have limited application occasions, [24] uses deep learning Faster RCNN model and VGG16 as feature extractor to detect mirrorlike material defects with 94% accuracy. [25] proposed a classification and recognition method for surface defects of sheet metal parts with small samples based on CNN model, built a classic CNN model and fine-tuned parameters, and used data augmentation technology to expand the number of samples.…”
Section: Deep Learning Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Features need to be extracted manually; The robustness of the system is poor; Most of the system cannot achieve end-to-end structure. SVM [7,[16][17][18]21] RF [13,20] Deep Learning CNN [23][24][25][28][29][30] Deep extraction of effective feature information; Good robustness; High efficiency.…”
Section: Concrete Model or Algorithm Advantages Disadvantagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We chose three of the most extensively used neural networks based on our systematic review [5] and the recommendations provided by Kermanidis et al [23]. Although there is a lack of studies focused on ceramic pieces, it is worth noting that ResNet [15] and VGG [24] have been successfully implemented by researchers. Additionally, we included AlexNet in our selection due to its abundance of information and studies showcasing successful defect detection.…”
Section: Network Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%