Laser Beam Control and Applications 2006
DOI: 10.1117/12.647427
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated test station for laser-induced damage threshold measurements according to ISO 11254-2 standard

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In case of damage, the scattering signal is increased and irradiation is stopped. Software based on the programming package LabWIeW was used in order to control the measurement procedure: positioning of experimental sample in X and Y directions, attenuation of laser pulse energy, shutter, automation of damage detection and statistical result analysis [12]. The main parameters are presented in Table 2.…”
Section: Deposition Of Experimental Coatings and Lidt Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In case of damage, the scattering signal is increased and irradiation is stopped. Software based on the programming package LabWIeW was used in order to control the measurement procedure: positioning of experimental sample in X and Y directions, attenuation of laser pulse energy, shutter, automation of damage detection and statistical result analysis [12]. The main parameters are presented in Table 2.…”
Section: Deposition Of Experimental Coatings and Lidt Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wavefront sensor technique under consideration is based on the quadri-wave lateral shearing interferometry (QWLSI) technique [2,3]. It is a commercial sensor (SID4bio©) developed by PHASICS SA (Palaiseau, France) [3].…”
Section: Phase Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence, many detection methods have been reported in the literature, each one trying to give the most accurate threshold of the laser-induced damage occurrence. These methods include scattering (dark field imaging or scattering measurement of a probe beam), imaging, plasma detection, spectrophotometry, photoacoustic effect, reflectivity or transmittivity measurements [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. Visual inspection under Nomarski (DIC) microscope is often found to be the most reliable and sensitive technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The facility has well-settled testing stations according to ISO 21254 standard series recommendations (block scheme on Figure 2) and it is able to produce ISO 21254 compliant test reports [6] .…”
Section: Testing Facilitymentioning
confidence: 99%