2010
DOI: 10.3233/aic-2010-0460
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated theorem proving in quasigroup and loop theory

Abstract: We survey all known results in the area of quasigroup and loop theory to have been obtained with the assistance of automated theorem provers. We provide both informal and formal descriptions of selected problems, and compare the performance of selected state-of-the art first order theorem provers on them. Our analysis yields some surprising results, e.g., the theorem prover most often used by loop theorists does not necessarily yield the best performance.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following [13], the parameters were set to P T = 55dBm, η = 4 (outdoors), mean X σ = 0, and variance σ = 5. In addition, the network delay was set to 3 seconds according to [13], [26], and [27], and the run time was 300 seconds. For consistency with several real applications, e.g., indoor positioning, geological detection and water quality monitoring, the speeds of the mobile nodes were set to 5 m/s, 10 m/s and 15 m/s.…”
Section: A Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following [13], the parameters were set to P T = 55dBm, η = 4 (outdoors), mean X σ = 0, and variance σ = 5. In addition, the network delay was set to 3 seconds according to [13], [26], and [27], and the run time was 300 seconds. For consistency with several real applications, e.g., indoor positioning, geological detection and water quality monitoring, the speeds of the mobile nodes were set to 5 m/s, 10 m/s and 15 m/s.…”
Section: A Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Automated theorem proving and mathematics will benefit from advanced ML integration. One of the mathematical subfields where automated theorem provers are heavily used is the field of quasigroup and loop theory [12]. A quasigroup is similar to a group, but it does not guarantee associativity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They appeared already in the milestone paper of Knuth and Bendix [24], and interest in them has continued in the theoremproving community [12] [49]. In more recent years, mathematicians specializing in quasigroups and loops have been making significant use of automated deduction tools [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29] [ 36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44]. With the exception of [39] and [40], all of the aforementioned references used Bill McCune's Prover9 [31] or its predecessor Otter [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%