2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2020.101185
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated thresholding method for the computed tomography inspection of the internal composition of parts fabricated using additive manufacturing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Samples were stacked during the scan, and tomography slices were reconstructed using X‐ray cone‐beam back projections. Raw XCT data sets were imported into MATLAB (R2021a) for post‐processing according to the process outlined in Chisena et al 32 . Each sample data set was thresholded and segmented for porosity using a normalized histogram of voxel intensity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Samples were stacked during the scan, and tomography slices were reconstructed using X‐ray cone‐beam back projections. Raw XCT data sets were imported into MATLAB (R2021a) for post‐processing according to the process outlined in Chisena et al 32 . Each sample data set was thresholded and segmented for porosity using a normalized histogram of voxel intensity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Samples were stacked during the scan, and tomography slices were reconstructed using X-ray cone-beam back projections. Raw XCT data sets were imported into MATLAB (R2021a) for post-processing according to the process outlined in Chisena et al 32 Each sample data set was thresholded and segmented for porosity using a normalized histogram of voxel intensity. Segmentation was conducted according to mixed Gaussian distribution clustering which treats XCT measurement artifacts as random noise and models internal sample features as a mixture of Gaussian distributions.…”
Section: Microstructural and Defect Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%