2013 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/icacci.2013.6637151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic assamese text categorization using WordNet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are various emotion analysers for the English language [4][5][6][7][8], but little work has been done in the context of Indian languages [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. The fundamental reason for this is a scarcity of materials in Indian languages.…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are various emotion analysers for the English language [4][5][6][7][8], but little work has been done in the context of Indian languages [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. The fundamental reason for this is a scarcity of materials in Indian languages.…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sarmah, Saharia and Sarma [8] presented an approach for classification of Assamese documents using Assamese WordNet. This approach has accuracy of 90.27 % on Assamese documents.…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [11] authors have examined decision tree algorithm for Assamese WSD. A sense annotated corpus of 50K sentences for 160 ambiguous words is developed using Assamese Corpus [12] and Assamese WordNet [13] . The context window size of ±2 is used in the disambiguation process.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then the trained classifier model was employed to test the testing text set. The categorization results were assessed using two universal general indexes: precision rate and recall rate [22]. In order to demonstrate the superiority of the proposed method, we compared the experimental results with TF·IDF method.…”
Section: B Feature Selection and Categorizationmentioning
confidence: 99%