2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2010
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2010.5539841
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic attribution of ancient Roman imperial coins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
70
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
70
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The first observation that emerges from the tables concerns the poor performance of the method which correctly recognized no more than 5% of query coins in the best case. This is consistent with previous reports in the literature [9], with the method showing any promise only in the context of the far simpler problem of coin instance recognition. The second clear observation concerns the superiority of the Hellinger distance based histogram metric as compared with the more conventional Euclidean distance.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The first observation that emerges from the tables concerns the poor performance of the method which correctly recognized no more than 5% of query coins in the best case. This is consistent with previous reports in the literature [9], with the method showing any promise only in the context of the far simpler problem of coin instance recognition. The second clear observation concerns the superiority of the Hellinger distance based histogram metric as compared with the more conventional Euclidean distance.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Alternatively, smaller values of k, more often used for object class recognition, can be seen as a means of generalization. Although this choice has not been explicitly discussed in the existing literature of automatic ancient coin analysis, implicitly the latter view seems to be dominant [9]. Considering the lack of systematic analysis to date, we take no a priori stance and instead conduct experiments for a range of values of k.…”
Section: Baseline Siftmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations