2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-13666-5_91
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic BI-RADS Description of Mammographic Masses

Abstract: Abstract. This paper presents a CBIR (Content Based Information Retrieval) framework for automatic description of mammographic masses according to the well known BI-RADS lexicon. Unlike other approaches, we do not attempt to segment masses but instead, we describe the regions an expert selects, after the series of rules defined in the BI-RADS lexicon. The content based retrieval strategy searches similar regions by automatically computing the Mahalanobis distance of feature vectors that describe main shape and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main obstacle in making such a system completely automatic is the lesion detection module, since the accuracy of feature calculation is Table 1 Comparative results of the semantic descriptors estimation using competing methods. The hamming loss (6) is used as the quality measure (a value of 1 corresponds to perfect prediction).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The main obstacle in making such a system completely automatic is the lesion detection module, since the accuracy of feature calculation is Table 1 Comparative results of the semantic descriptors estimation using competing methods. The hamming loss (6) is used as the quality measure (a value of 1 corresponds to perfect prediction).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ROI from where the visual features are calculated is obtained by a semiautomatic active contour-type lesion boundary detection method. We compared our method with the somewhat competing approaches of Narvaez et al [6] and Wei et al [7], which are essentially k-nearest neighbors (KNN) approaches, and of Burnside et al [8] and Rubin et al [9], which perform each semantic descriptor estimation independently using a classifier. The performance measure we used is the Hamming loss defined in (6) with equal weights, averaged over the testing set of images, and over the 10 random subsampling experiments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation