2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-16-7771-7_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic Brain Tumor Classification in 2D MRI Images Using Integrated Deep Learning and Supervised Machine Learning Techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Precious et al [20] propose three optimizers, including ADAM, SGDM, and RMSprop, from whom detection accuracy of 98.1%, 92.5%, and 83.0% is attained. In order to detect tumors, four supervised machine learning classifiers are used once the features have been retrieved using CNN.…”
Section: Biswas Et Al In 2021mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Precious et al [20] propose three optimizers, including ADAM, SGDM, and RMSprop, from whom detection accuracy of 98.1%, 92.5%, and 83.0% is attained. In order to detect tumors, four supervised machine learning classifiers are used once the features have been retrieved using CNN.…”
Section: Biswas Et Al In 2021mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is also a method in [17] for classifying MRI brain cancer based on grayscale, symmetry, and texture features. Three optimizers, namely ADAM, SGDM, and RMSprop, are suggested by Precious et al [18], from which detection rate of 98.1%, 92.5%, and 83.0% is acquired. To represent model experts, Papageorgiou et al [19] developed the fuzzy cognitive map (FCM).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%