Automatic change detection in vision: Adaptation, memory mismatch, or both? II: Oddball and adaptation effects on event-related potentials

Bodnár, Flóra; File, Domonkos; Sulykos, István; Kecskés-Kovács, Krisztina; Czigler, István

doi:10.3758/s13414-017-1402-x

Cited by 7 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 70 publications

(101 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In control subjects, vMMN for the V12 windmill pattern was detected both in the frontal and occipital regions, while in patients vMMN appeared only over the frontal region, but between-group difference was not detected in visual stimuli in any regions. This pattern of result is consistent with previous studies using the same paradigm with healthy controls 78 . We detected vMMN in the patient group only in the late time window at the frontal region.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 93%

A comparison of visual and acoustic mismatch negativity as potential biomarkers in schizophrenia

Molnár,

Marosi,

Becske

et al. 2024

Sci Rep

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Mismatch negativity (MMN) is an event-related potential (ERP) component generated when an unexpected deviant stimulus occurs in a pattern of standard stimuli. Several studies showed that the MMN response to both auditory and visual stimuli is attenuated in schizophrenia. While previous studies investigated auditory and visual MMN in different cohorts, here we examined the potential clinical utility of MMN responses to auditory and visual stimuli within the same group of patients. Altogether 39 patients with schizophrenia and 39 healthy controls matched in age, gender, and education were enrolled. We recorded EEG using 64 channels in eight experimental blocks where we presented auditory and visual stimulus sequences. Mismatch responses were obtained by subtracting responses to standard from the physically identical deviant stimuli. We found a significant MMN response to the acoustic stimuli in the control group, whereas no significant mismatch response was observed in the patient group. The group difference was significant for the acoustic stimuli. The 12 vane windmill pattern evoked a significant MMN response in the early time window in the control group but not in the patient group. The 6 vane windmill pattern evoked MMN only in the patient group. However, we found no significant difference between the groups. Furthermore, we found no correlation between the clinical variables and the MMN amplitudes. Our results suggest that predictive processes underlying mismatch generation in patients with schizophrenia may be more affected in the acoustic compared to the visual domain. Acoustic MMN tends to be a more promising biomarker in schizophrenia.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 93%

A comparison of visual and acoustic mismatch negativity as potential biomarkers in schizophrenia

Molnár,

Marosi,

Becske

et al. 2024

Sci Rep

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In this respect, the reversal of the deviant-standard relationship within short sequences (roving standard paradigm) is a more promising method (e.g., Baldeweg et al 2004 ). Furthermore, a comparison of the deviant-related effects in the oddball paradigm and in paradigms developed for investigating adaptation is a more direct possibility (Bodnar et al 2017 ). Another limitation in the present design is that it is impossible to compare the precise level of adaptation in the two equiprobable conditions for the oblique line and the snowflake stimuli.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Visual mismatch negativity and stimulus-specific adaptation: the role of stimulus complexity

et al. 2019

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The present study investigated the function of the brain activity underlying the visual mismatch negativity (vMMN) event-related potential (ERP) component. Snowflake patterns (complex stimuli) were presented as deviants and oblique bar patterns (simple stimuli) as standards, and vice versa in a passive oddball paradigm. Control (equiprobable) sequences of either complex shape patterns or oblique bar patterns with various orientations were also presented. VMMN appeared as the difference between the ERP to the oddball deviant and the ERP to the control (deviant minus control ERP difference). Apart from the shorter latency of the vMMN to the oblique bar pattern as deviant, vMMN to both deviants was similar, i.e., there was no amplitude difference. We attributed the function of the brain processes underlying vMMN to the detection of the infrequent stimulus type (also represented in memory) instead of a call for further processing (a possibility for acquiring more precise representation) of the deviant. An unexpected larger adaptation (control minus standard ERP difference) to the snowflake pattern was also obtained. We suggest that this was due to the acquisition of a more elaborate memory representation of the more complex stimulus. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s00221-019-05494-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

show abstract

“…In a related study [23] after the onset of texture patterns vMMN emerged within the 100-150 ms range. The second one corresponds to the range of the posterior N1 component [10,[18][19][20][21][23][24][25], whereas in the latest range, a Deviant minus Control difference was recorded by Kimura et al [20]. We chose this calculation to reduce the number of comparisons [26].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The second aim was to explore the possibility of vMMN modulation by the presence of an object in the visual field. This is because the features of an object (e.g., orientation) may adapt the visual structures similar to those involved in processing of the vMMN related stimuli, therefore change the sensibility of these structures for particular visual features (stimulus-specific adaptation) [10].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The effect of hand motion and object orientation on the automatic detection of orientation: A visual mismatch negativity study

et al. 2020

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We investigated the effects of voluntary hand movements and continuously present objects on the automatic detection of deviant stimuli in a passive oddball paradigm. The visual mismatch negativity (vMMN) component of event-related potentials (ERPs) was measured as the index of automatic deviant detection. The stimuli were textures consisting of parallel, oblique bars with frequent (standard) and infrequent (deviant) orientation. Traditional vMMN was measured by the difference between ERPs to frequent (standard) and infrequent (deviant) textures. Additionally, we measured 'genuine' vMMN by comparing the ERPs to deviant and control textures in the equal probability procedure. Compatible and incompatible hand movement directions to the standard texture had no influence on 'traditional' vMMN and elicited no 'genuine' vMMN. However, the deviant texture elicited 'genuine' vMMN if the orientation of a continuously present rectangle was different from the standard (and identical to the deviant) texture orientation. Our results suggest that the direction of voluntary hand movement and the orientation of task-irrelevant visual patterns do not acquire common memory representation, but a continuously present object contributes to the detection of sequential regularity violation.

show abstract

Automatic change detection in vision: Adaptation, memory mismatch, or both? II: Oddball and adaptation effects on event-related potentials

Cited by 7 publications

References 70 publications

A comparison of visual and acoustic mismatch negativity as potential biomarkers in schizophrenia

A comparison of visual and acoustic mismatch negativity as potential biomarkers in schizophrenia

Visual mismatch negativity and stimulus-specific adaptation: the role of stimulus complexity

The effect of hand motion and object orientation on the automatic detection of orientation: A visual mismatch negativity study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About