Abstract:Background
Oral cancer is a deadly disease among the most common malignant tumors worldwide, and it has become an increasingly important public health problem in developing and low‐to‐middle income countries. This study aims to use the convolutional neural network (CNN) deep learning algorithms to develop an automated classification and detection model for oral cancer screening.
Methods
The study included 700 clinical oral photographs, collected retrospectively from the oral and maxillofacial center, which wer… Show more
“…Since its introduction in 1991 [ 36 ], OCT has been developed to provide high-resolution images at a faster speed and has played an important role in the biomedical field. In an AI analysis study of OCT images published by Yang et al, it was reported that the sensitivity and specificity of oral cancer diagnosis was 98% or more [ 22 ]. In our study, OCT images were found to be the most accurate diagnostic test, with sensitivity of 94% in AI diagnosis compared to other image tools (sensitivity of autofluorescence and photographic images of 89% and 91%, respectively).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Forest plot of the diagnostic odds ratios for ( A ) screening only oral cancerous lesions [ 13 , 16 , 17 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 25 ] and ( B ) screening all premalignant mucosal lesions [ 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 23 , 24 ]. …”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“… Forest plots of ( A ) sensitivity, ( B ) specificity, and ( C ) negative predictive values for screening oral cancerous lesions [ 13 , 16 , 17 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 25 ]. …”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Egger's test result (p > 0.05) also shows that the possibility of publication bias is low. Forest plot of the diagnostic odds ratios for (A) screening only oral cancerous lesions [13,16,17,[21][22][23]25] and (B) screening all premalignant mucosal lesions [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]23,24].…”
Section: Diagnostic Accuracy Of Ai-assisted Screening Of Oral Mucosal...mentioning
The accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted discrimination of oral cancerous lesions from normal mucosa based on mucosal images was evaluated. Two authors independently reviewed the database until June 2022. Oral mucosal disorder, as recorded by photographic images, autofluorescence, and optical coherence tomography (OCT), was compared with the reference results by histology findings. True-positive, true-negative, false-positive, and false-negative data were extracted. Seven studies were included for discriminating oral cancerous lesions from normal mucosa. The diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of AI-assisted screening was 121.66 (95% confidence interval [CI], 29.60; 500.05). Twelve studies were included for discriminating all oral precancerous lesions from normal mucosa. The DOR of screening was 63.02 (95% CI, 40.32; 98.49). Subgroup analysis showed that OCT was more diagnostically accurate (324.33 vs. 66.81 and 27.63) and more negatively predictive (0.94 vs. 0.93 and 0.84) than photographic images and autofluorescence on the screening for all oral precancerous lesions from normal mucosa. Automated detection of oral cancerous lesions by AI would be a rapid, non-invasive diagnostic tool that could provide immediate results on the diagnostic work-up of oral cancer. This method has the potential to be used as a clinical tool for the early diagnosis of pathological lesions.
“…Since its introduction in 1991 [ 36 ], OCT has been developed to provide high-resolution images at a faster speed and has played an important role in the biomedical field. In an AI analysis study of OCT images published by Yang et al, it was reported that the sensitivity and specificity of oral cancer diagnosis was 98% or more [ 22 ]. In our study, OCT images were found to be the most accurate diagnostic test, with sensitivity of 94% in AI diagnosis compared to other image tools (sensitivity of autofluorescence and photographic images of 89% and 91%, respectively).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Forest plot of the diagnostic odds ratios for ( A ) screening only oral cancerous lesions [ 13 , 16 , 17 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 25 ] and ( B ) screening all premalignant mucosal lesions [ 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 23 , 24 ]. …”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“… Forest plots of ( A ) sensitivity, ( B ) specificity, and ( C ) negative predictive values for screening oral cancerous lesions [ 13 , 16 , 17 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 25 ]. …”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Egger's test result (p > 0.05) also shows that the possibility of publication bias is low. Forest plot of the diagnostic odds ratios for (A) screening only oral cancerous lesions [13,16,17,[21][22][23]25] and (B) screening all premalignant mucosal lesions [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]23,24].…”
Section: Diagnostic Accuracy Of Ai-assisted Screening Of Oral Mucosal...mentioning
The accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted discrimination of oral cancerous lesions from normal mucosa based on mucosal images was evaluated. Two authors independently reviewed the database until June 2022. Oral mucosal disorder, as recorded by photographic images, autofluorescence, and optical coherence tomography (OCT), was compared with the reference results by histology findings. True-positive, true-negative, false-positive, and false-negative data were extracted. Seven studies were included for discriminating oral cancerous lesions from normal mucosa. The diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of AI-assisted screening was 121.66 (95% confidence interval [CI], 29.60; 500.05). Twelve studies were included for discriminating all oral precancerous lesions from normal mucosa. The DOR of screening was 63.02 (95% CI, 40.32; 98.49). Subgroup analysis showed that OCT was more diagnostically accurate (324.33 vs. 66.81 and 27.63) and more negatively predictive (0.94 vs. 0.93 and 0.84) than photographic images and autofluorescence on the screening for all oral precancerous lesions from normal mucosa. Automated detection of oral cancerous lesions by AI would be a rapid, non-invasive diagnostic tool that could provide immediate results on the diagnostic work-up of oral cancer. This method has the potential to be used as a clinical tool for the early diagnosis of pathological lesions.
ObjectivesArtificial intelligence (AI) is an emerging field in dentistry. AI is gradually being integrated into dentistry to improve clinical dental practice. The aims of this scoping review were to investigate the application of AI in image analysis for decision‐making in clinical dentistry and identify trends and research gaps in the current literature.Material and MethodsThis review followed the guidelines provided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA‐ScR). An electronic literature search was performed through PubMed and Scopus. After removing duplicates, a preliminary screening based on titles and abstracts was performed. A full‐text review and analysis were performed according to predefined inclusion criteria, and data were extracted from eligible articles.ResultsOf the 1334 articles returned, 276 met the inclusion criteria (consisting of 601,122 images in total) and were included in the qualitative synthesis. Most of the included studies utilized convolutional neural networks (CNNs) on dental radiographs such as orthopantomograms (OPGs) and intraoral radiographs (bitewings and periapicals). AI was applied across all fields of dentistry ‐ particularly oral medicine, oral surgery, and orthodontics ‐ for direct clinical inference and segmentation. AI‐based image analysis was use in several components of the clinical decision‐making process, including diagnosis, detection or classification, prediction, and management.ConclusionsA variety of machine learning and deep learning techniques are being used for dental image analysis to assist clinicians in making accurate diagnoses and choosing appropriate interventions in a timely manner.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.