2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.imu.2020.100305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic classification of cognitively normal, mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease using structural MRI analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data type AUC [51] sMRI 0.8722 [52] sMRI 0.861 [53] sMRI 0.76 [57] SNPs (482) 0.842 [16] SNPs (2500) 0.719 [58] SNPs (11) 0.8949 MRI 0.993 [59] sMRI 0.9252 [60] amyloid PET 0.908 [61] amyloid PET + MRI 0.9234 [63] SNPs (200) 0.62 [17] SNPs (20 & 50) 0.68 [18] SNPs (41) 0.6807 [19] SNPs (20) 0.689 *Note: images data results were measured by ACC journal.ump.edu.my/ijsecs ◄ Furthermore, when the results of ML and DL based approaches were compared in terms of genetic variants data and neuroimaging data, shown Table 3, it was found that DL based approaches had achieved better performance in Neuroimaging data compared to ML based approaches, while they were relatively poor with SNPs data.…”
Section: Table 1 ML Approaches Results With Mri and Snps Data Ref Nomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Data type AUC [51] sMRI 0.8722 [52] sMRI 0.861 [53] sMRI 0.76 [57] SNPs (482) 0.842 [16] SNPs (2500) 0.719 [58] SNPs (11) 0.8949 MRI 0.993 [59] sMRI 0.9252 [60] amyloid PET 0.908 [61] amyloid PET + MRI 0.9234 [63] SNPs (200) 0.62 [17] SNPs (20 & 50) 0.68 [18] SNPs (41) 0.6807 [19] SNPs (20) 0.689 *Note: images data results were measured by ACC journal.ump.edu.my/ijsecs ◄ Furthermore, when the results of ML and DL based approaches were compared in terms of genetic variants data and neuroimaging data, shown Table 3, it was found that DL based approaches had achieved better performance in Neuroimaging data compared to ML based approaches, while they were relatively poor with SNPs data.…”
Section: Table 1 ML Approaches Results With Mri and Snps Data Ref Nomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SVM with radial basis function (RBF) kernel attained the best outcomes with AUC of 0.861. Moreover, Researchers in [53] utilized 1,167 sMRI scans to classify normal cognitive (NC) state and three different states of dementia: early MCI, late MCI, and probable AD. The approach trained six ML classifiers: KNN, Decision tree, RF, Naïve Bayes (NB), linear SVM and nonlinear SVM with RBF kernel.…”
Section: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (Mri) Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SVM with a 2-degree polynomial kernel was used to classify AD. The proposed approach in [54] was developed to predict AD and MCI early and classify them from elderly cognitively normal. To compute CT of several anatomical regions from segmented gray matter tissue, the FreeSurfer method was used and required features were extracted.…”
Section: ) Ml-based Approaches In Ad Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computer aided mathematical biomedical image texture analysis provides an aid to radiology by interpreting the image in terms of statistical features and signal variation algorithms giving a quantitative definition of image. List of latest texture based studies [18]- [24] on Brain atrophy MRI are listed in Table 1A.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%