2017 IEEE 12th International Conference on ASIC (ASICON) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/asicon.2017.8252657
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic classification of leukocytes using deep neural network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
32
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…To evaluate the capability of WBC-Profiler on leukocytes classification, we have compared it with one of the state-of-the-art techniques in the field of leukocytes classification (we refer it to as DeepVote, which combines the classification results from different deep neural networks to vote for the final decision) [23] and with one of the most successful deep learning techniques in the field of object detection and recognition, i.e., Faster R-CNN [28] with both vgg16 and res101 as the network architectures. During evaluation, half-half cross-validation was employed with 10 iterations, where, at each iteration, we randomly selected 50% of the data per cell type for training, and used the rest for testing, and the performance in terms of average F1-measure and confusion matrix was illustrated in Figure 3, which demonstrates the effectiveness of WBC-Profiler for leukocytes classification.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To evaluate the capability of WBC-Profiler on leukocytes classification, we have compared it with one of the state-of-the-art techniques in the field of leukocytes classification (we refer it to as DeepVote, which combines the classification results from different deep neural networks to vote for the final decision) [23] and with one of the most successful deep learning techniques in the field of object detection and recognition, i.e., Faster R-CNN [28] with both vgg16 and res101 as the network architectures. During evaluation, half-half cross-validation was employed with 10 iterations, where, at each iteration, we randomly selected 50% of the data per cell type for training, and used the rest for testing, and the performance in terms of average F1-measure and confusion matrix was illustrated in Figure 3, which demonstrates the effectiveness of WBC-Profiler for leukocytes classification.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Motivated by recent neuroscience findings [9, 10], unsupervised learning and deep learning techniques [11–13] have gained momentum during the past decade for object representation and recognition (e.g., face representation and recognition) [14–17]. And their applications in various biomedical tasks [18–22] have demonstrated success with the potential to provide a new avenue to data-intensive clinical studies, among which, the leukocytes classification accuracy has been significantly improved due to the employment of deep neural networks (DNNs) [23]. However, systems of such kind typically only provide the end-to-end (i.e., from data to classification) solution, which leaves the characterization of white blood cells inaccessible, and thus impede the construction of leukocytes profile for many potential needs, including profile interpretation, profile optimization, profile differentiation among cell types as well as profile association with other meaningful endpoints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This section covers some of the research conducted in the field of diseases, especially blood disease detection and diagnosis. Some of these studies pertain to traditional methods [8,9], which consist of several steps such as pre-processing, segmentation, feature extraction, and classification, whereas other methods pertain to deep-learning-based methods [6,[10][11][12], which use deep neural networks for end-to-end learning tasks.…”
Section: Related Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model proposed by Yu et al [10] is a combination of state-of-the-art convolution neural networks including ResNet50, InceptionV3, VGG16, VGG19 and Xception for automatic cell recognition system using convolutional neural networks. The obtained result of the proposed model is compared to traditional machine learning algorithms such as K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Logistic Regression (LR), and Decision Tree (DT).…”
Section: Related Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%