2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00521-021-05849-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic classification of volcanic rocks from thin section images using transfer learning networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, Figure 26 shows GoogLeNet and VGG16's classification precision for the three types of rock with the use of Adam, SGD and RMSprop. It could be concluded that the classification effect of the model trained with the SGD optimizer was worse than that of the other two optimizers for both GoogLeNet and VGG16, which is also basically consistent with the conclusion of [30].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, Figure 26 shows GoogLeNet and VGG16's classification precision for the three types of rock with the use of Adam, SGD and RMSprop. It could be concluded that the classification effect of the model trained with the SGD optimizer was worse than that of the other two optimizers for both GoogLeNet and VGG16, which is also basically consistent with the conclusion of [30].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Additionally, Figure 26 shows GoogLeNet and VGG16's classification preci the three types of rock with the use of Adam, SGD and RMSprop. It could be con that the classification effect of the model trained with the SGD optimizer was wor that of the other two optimizers for both GoogLeNet and VGG16, which is also b consistent with the conclusion of [30]. In summary, the best options for the intelligent classification of rock thin-section images are the cosine decay mode, RMSprop optimizer, and VGG16 classification model.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…However, conventional extraction techniques are unable to produce effective recognition results in thin mineral-rich sandstone sections. Thus, deep learning provides a new method for rock thin section identification . Borazjani et al developed two intelligent models to identify carbonate reservoir structures and air attack spaces, and achieved positive outcomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wanhyuk Seo [12] use ResNet152 to classify lithofacies thin sections and use Grad-CAM to visualize the output features of the last convolutional layer. Polat [13] transfer learned two CNN models to classify volcanic rocks. The above methods have achieved great results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%