2017
DOI: 10.1007/s40429-017-0168-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic Cognitive Processes and Youth Substance Use: Risks and Prevention

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This misperception could be the result of the repeated alcohol messages promoted by the alcohol industry. According to SCT, when the same information is processed repeatedly and consciously, the information is integrated through an "automatic cognitive process" [12,13]. Thus, the quantity of alcohol promotion we objectively measured on-field was much higher than what they reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This misperception could be the result of the repeated alcohol messages promoted by the alcohol industry. According to SCT, when the same information is processed repeatedly and consciously, the information is integrated through an "automatic cognitive process" [12,13]. Thus, the quantity of alcohol promotion we objectively measured on-field was much higher than what they reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…One of the learning processes related with SCT is the "automatic cognitive process" [12]. Previous studies had defined this process as a mediator in the associations between the ubiquitous presence of alcohol (e.g., alcohol cues at promotion) and the early alcohol use [13][14][15]. Thus, physical features of the alcohol environment could influence the normalization of alcohol consumption and the self-capacity of refusing to drink alcohol [8,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…System One is described as spontaneous, fast, and operates without conscious awareness, whereas System Two operates at a conscious level of awareness, and is slower, reflective, and effortful ( Kahneman, 2011 ). The automatic processes of System 1 influence decisions, judgements, and behaviours without the individual becoming conscious awareness of the influence System 1 is having on the present moment ( Krank & Robinson, 2017 ). Strong evidence for a dual processing approach to cognition is born out in assessments of automatic cognition such as response time measures and approach-avoidance tasks ( Kahneman, 2011 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have devised two theoretically different approaches to measuring System One and System Two cognition as it relates to substance use. To measure System One cognitive processes, researchers use indirect methods that do not ask the participant to consciously deliberate their response (e.g., reaction time tasks; Krank & Robinson, 2017 ). Indirect measures of substance use cognitions ask about the fundamental concept indirectly, yet responses related to substance use may be generated spontaneously and automatically ( Krank & Robinson, 2017 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tests of spontaneous memory associations relevant to cannabis have been shown to be useful in explaining and predicting adolescent cannabis use habits (Ames, Zogg, & Stacy, 2002; Ames & Stacy 1998; Ames, Xie, Shono, & Stacy, 2017; Krank, Schoenfeld, & Frigon, 2010; Stacy, 1997; for a review, see Krank & Robinson, 2017). Consistent evidence of the predictive utility of these tests among adolescents and other populations also has been reported for tobacco (Grenard, Ames, Wiers, Thush, Sussman, & Stacy, 2008; Kelly, Haynes, & Marlatt, 2008) and alcohol use (Ames & Stacy, 1998; Kelly, Masterman, & Marlatt, 2005; van der Vorst, Krank, Engels, Pieters, Burk, & Mares, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%