2019 11th International Symposium on Image and Signal Processing and Analysis (ISPA) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/ispa.2019.8868619
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic Crack Detection using Mask R-CNN

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For this purpose, authors labelled 2,366 images with the size of 500×375 for training. Attard et al (2019) trained a Mask R-CNN with 200 images to locate cracks on the concrete surface at pixel level. Kim and Cho (2019) used 376 images in their training data for Mask R-CNN to find the cracks on a concrete wall with high resolution cameras and utilized an additional image processing procedure on each bounding box to quantitatively measure the width of these cracks.…”
Section: Spalling and Cracks Detection With Deep Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose, authors labelled 2,366 images with the size of 500×375 for training. Attard et al (2019) trained a Mask R-CNN with 200 images to locate cracks on the concrete surface at pixel level. Kim and Cho (2019) used 376 images in their training data for Mask R-CNN to find the cracks on a concrete wall with high resolution cameras and utilized an additional image processing procedure on each bounding box to quantitatively measure the width of these cracks.…”
Section: Spalling and Cracks Detection With Deep Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, a comparative analysis of different baseline network models (ZF-Net, VGG-16, ResNet-50, and ResNet-101) and different target detection algorithms (SSD Algorithms, YOLO V2 Algorithms, Faster R-CNN Algorithms, and ME-Faster R-CNN Algorithms) was performed, showing the best performance for ResNet networks and ME-Faster R-CNN, respectively. The research by Leanne Attard et al [26] demonstrated an automated crack detection model using Mask R-CNN, which was trained on its own ground truth database, which was a subset of the regular crack dataset. After training the model, the precision value achieved was 93.94% and the recall value was 77.5%.…”
Section: B R-cnn Deep Learning Model Familymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We verified that the proposed bi-CRRN could successfully detect and localize the welding defects. The performance of the proposed bi-CRRN was compared with recent defect detection algorithms such as mask-RCNN [30], U-Net [31], DeepLabv3 [32], 3D-CNN [33], ConvLSTM, and CRRN. The network architectures of 3D-CNN and ConvLSTM, which exploit spatial and temporal information, were implemented based on the CRRN architecture.…”
Section: Pixel-level Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%