1985
DOI: 10.1016/0045-7949(85)90070-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic crack propagation tracking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The advantage of the MFEM, implemented through the ABAQUS and PYTHON, is that it is based on the FEM using user defined subroutine, combining the GMTS criterion with the interaction integral method. During the simulation (Figure 4), the propagation of the studied crack is obtained by the elongation of many small cracks and its successful implementation also depends on the overall remeshing technique [47,48] and the method of incremental crack propagation [21,49]. In addition, considering the influence of mesh size h and increment of the crack propagation length i on the calculation accuracy, both h and i adopted the recommended values (generally, half of the internal parameters is chosen as the h and h/2 ≤ i < h) [19,25,49].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantage of the MFEM, implemented through the ABAQUS and PYTHON, is that it is based on the FEM using user defined subroutine, combining the GMTS criterion with the interaction integral method. During the simulation (Figure 4), the propagation of the studied crack is obtained by the elongation of many small cracks and its successful implementation also depends on the overall remeshing technique [47,48] and the method of incremental crack propagation [21,49]. In addition, considering the influence of mesh size h and increment of the crack propagation length i on the calculation accuracy, both h and i adopted the recommended values (generally, half of the internal parameters is chosen as the h and h/2 ≤ i < h) [19,25,49].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3b). The crack could be then simulated either by introducing a discrete interface or an additional set of nodes [47,48,49,50,51,52,53] (see Fig. 6).…”
Section: Discrete Crack Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prediction of crack growth for 3D models, under various modes of loading, has been made in many studies for a number of years. [1][2][3][4] In most of the above cases the prediction techniques were limited to crack growth within a small region of the model. Crack growth in real large-sized structures, has also been analyzed by many researchers.…”
Section: E a R L I E R S T U D I E S O N T H R E E -D I M E N S I O Nmentioning
confidence: 99%