2019
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic curation of large comparative animal MicroRNA datasets

Abstract: Motivation MicroRNAs form an important class of RNA regulators that has been studied extensively. The miRBase and Rfam database provide rich, frequently updated information on both pre-miRNAs and their mature forms. These data sources, however, rely on individual data submission and thus are neither complete nor consistent in their coverage across different miRNA families. Quantitative studies of miRNA evolution therefore are difficult or impossible on this basis. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An additional 20 loci, which harbor two additional families, correspond to previously reported miRNAs [21] which were successfully mapped into the new assembly. To avoid the annotation of false positives due to the modification of the threshold values (see Additional File 1: Figure 12), the position of the mature sequence was evaluated using MIRFix [33] which used both, the RFAM database for the miRNA families alignments and miRBase as source for the annotated mature sequences (as explained in more detail in Methods and Additional File 1: Figure 5). As a result, the definition of a true miRNA candidate relies not only on the homology results given by the sequence/secondary structure comparison, but also in the annotation of their mature sequence.…”
Section: Annotation Of Noncoding Rnasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…An additional 20 loci, which harbor two additional families, correspond to previously reported miRNAs [21] which were successfully mapped into the new assembly. To avoid the annotation of false positives due to the modification of the threshold values (see Additional File 1: Figure 12), the position of the mature sequence was evaluated using MIRFix [33] which used both, the RFAM database for the miRNA families alignments and miRBase as source for the annotated mature sequences (as explained in more detail in Methods and Additional File 1: Figure 5). As a result, the definition of a true miRNA candidate relies not only on the homology results given by the sequence/secondary structure comparison, but also in the annotation of their mature sequence.…”
Section: Annotation Of Noncoding Rnasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to annotate the position of mature sequences from miRNA candidates, MIRfix [33] was used. The miRBase (v.22) mature and hairpin sequences were used as initial sequences resource.…”
Section: Annotation Of Non-coding Rnasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The precursor sequences available for a given family often have inconsistently defined ends, and the alignments for different families tend to differ in which species they include. Recent work also identified a moderate number of erroneous entries [19], see also [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…On the other hand, utilization of simple, blastbased homology searches alone tend to produce false positives that require extensive curation, which largely relies on the properties expected for a miRNA [17]. The features of canonical miRNAs can be translated in computational rules for the evaluation and editing of structure-annotated alignments of miRNA families that can be utilized to determine whether a candidate sequence fits to a known miRNA family or whether it constitutes a false-positive candidate [18,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%