2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00371-019-01742-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic darkest filament detection (ADFD): a new algorithm for crack extraction on two-dimensional pavement images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to highlight the advantages of the proposed method, we compare it with the expert evaluation results of the method proposed by Kaddah et al [6] and the method proposed by Yang et al [7]. The evaluation results of different methods by experts are shown in Table 1: Analyzing the data results in Table 1, it can see that the average score of the expert evaluation result of the proposed method is 93.6, while the average score of the expert evaluation result of the method proposed by Kaddah et al [6] is 84.4, and the average score of the expert evaluation result of the method proposed by Yang et al [7] is 77.3. From the data in the table, it can be seen that the experts have a higher evaluation of the proposed method, indicating that the method has a better crack detection effect.…”
Section: Verification Of Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In order to highlight the advantages of the proposed method, we compare it with the expert evaluation results of the method proposed by Kaddah et al [6] and the method proposed by Yang et al [7]. The evaluation results of different methods by experts are shown in Table 1: Analyzing the data results in Table 1, it can see that the average score of the expert evaluation result of the proposed method is 93.6, while the average score of the expert evaluation result of the method proposed by Kaddah et al [6] is 84.4, and the average score of the expert evaluation result of the method proposed by Yang et al [7] is 77.3. From the data in the table, it can be seen that the experts have a higher evaluation of the proposed method, indicating that the method has a better crack detection effect.…”
Section: Verification Of Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to further verify the effectiveness of the proposed method, Matlab 7.0 software is used for simulation experiments. Figure 7 is a schematic diagram of the comparison of the crack image edge detection between the proposed method and the method proposed by Kaddah et al [6] and the method proposed by Yang et al [7].…”
Section: Verification Of Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations