2015
DOI: 10.1002/pra2.2015.145052010082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic deception detection: Methods for finding fake news

Abstract: This research surveys the current state-of-the-art technologies that are instrumental in the adoption and development of fake news detection. "Fake news detection" is defined as the task of categorizing news along a continuum of veracity, with an associated measure of certainty. Veracity is compromised by the occurrence of intentional deceptions. The nature of online news publication has changed, such that traditional fact checking and vetting from potential deception is impossible against the flood arising fr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
312
0
17

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 677 publications
(332 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
312
0
17
Order By: Relevance
“…Conroy et al used linguistic approach (Both words and syntax) as well as network approach which says that message metadata or structured knowledge network queries can be harnessed to provide aggregate deception measures. They used Centering Resonance Analysis(CRA), a mode of networkbased text analysis [3]. Gupta et al presented a path breaking work by characterizing and identifying fake images on Twitter during Hurricane Sandy.…”
Section: IImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conroy et al used linguistic approach (Both words and syntax) as well as network approach which says that message metadata or structured knowledge network queries can be harnessed to provide aggregate deception measures. They used Centering Resonance Analysis(CRA), a mode of networkbased text analysis [3]. Gupta et al presented a path breaking work by characterizing and identifying fake images on Twitter during Hurricane Sandy.…”
Section: IImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rubin, Chen, and Conroy (2015) identified three types of fake news in their work -serious fabrications, large-scale hoaxes, and humorous fake news. Conroy, Rubin, and Chen (2015) were one of the first researchers to use network analysis in fake news detection while Mukherjee and colleagues (2013) used words and the respective part-of-speech tags, together with bigrams to achieve a 68.1% accuracy on Yelp review classification. Shu and colleagues (2017) provided a detailed overview of the recent approaches towards fake news detection and similar problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aforementioned hoax analysis can be categorized into two major approaches: linguistic and network. Here, we discuss hoax within online news text that put more weights on the linguistic aspect [11]. Linguistic approaches concern with texts as a bag of equally significant words, syntax structure like noun and verb phrases within the texts, and semantic analysis to recognize any contradictions on other texts with the similar topics of allegedly hoax texts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%