2013
DOI: 10.1109/tim.2012.2218677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic Defect Detection on Hot-Rolled Flat Steel Products

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
120
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 266 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
120
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…How to extract a set of better feature representations and design the appropriate classifier for surface defects has been a hot research topic for many years. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] A lot of methods about feature extraction and classification for image have been developed [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] , M. X. Chu et al 16 extracted features of geometry, gray, projection, texture and frequency-domain of defect in steel, then an enhanced twin support vector machine was adopted to realize the classification. A. Cord et al 12 proposed a classification method of statistical learning based on a textural feature for defect of metallic surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…How to extract a set of better feature representations and design the appropriate classifier for surface defects has been a hot research topic for many years. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] A lot of methods about feature extraction and classification for image have been developed [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] , M. X. Chu et al 16 extracted features of geometry, gray, projection, texture and frequency-domain of defect in steel, then an enhanced twin support vector machine was adopted to realize the classification. A. Cord et al 12 proposed a classification method of statistical learning based on a textural feature for defect of metallic surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A. Cord et al 12 proposed a classification method of statistical learning based on a textural feature for defect of metallic surface. S. Ghorai 7 derived a set of good-quality defect descriptors from wavelet feature set and applied support vector machine to the classification and detection of the defects. These traditional methods usually use handcrafted features, such as geometrical shape 11,13,15,16 , grayscale 1,13,16 , texture 3,[10][11][12] , local binary pattern 8 , wavelet transform [4][5][6][7]9 or their combinations 2,11,16 , followed by a trainable classifier, such as artificial neural networks 9,11,14 , support vector machine [6][7][8]13,15 and so on.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [2,3], the defects were classified by using K-nearest neighbor (KNN) methods with a co-occurrence matrix. Santanu Ghorai et al [4] described an automated visual inspection system with discrete wavelet transform (DWT) features and a support vector machine (SVM). Wu et al [5] described an algorithm with an undecimated wavelet transform (UWT) and a mathematical morphology to detect geometric defects that achieved a 90.23% accuracy that is difficult to achieve in real industrial application in 2008.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of existing works have focused on these two aspects to enhance the classification performance over the past few years. [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] A set of features are studied, including grayscale features, 9,10) geometric features, 9,10) shape features, [9][10][11] texture features, 10,12) Gabor filter output features, 13) Fourier spectral, 14) wavelet transform, [14][15][16][17] local binary pattern (LBP), 18,19) shearlet transform; 20) and the classifier of artificial neural network (ANN) 12,13,15) and support vector machine (SVM) 9,10,14,[17][18][19][20] is discussed. However, these approaches, which treat feature extraction and classifier training as two separating steps, are difficult to control the interaction of two steps.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%