2016
DOI: 10.1002/cpns.16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic Dendritic Spine Quantification from Confocal Data with Neurolucida 360

Abstract: Determining the density and morphology of dendritic spines is of high biological significance given the role of spines in synaptic plasticity and in neurodegenerative and neuropsychiatric disorders. Precise quantification of spines in three dimensions (3D) is essential for understanding the structural determinants of normal and pathological neuronal function. However, this quantification has been restricted to time- and labor-intensive methods such as electron microscopy and manual counting, which have limited… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
80
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Images of 40 μm‐thick sections were acquired, with z‐step 0.25 μm, using a 60x oil immersion objective (numerical aperture 1.4; pixel size, 0.23 x 0.23 μm) as described in our previous study (Gisabella et al, ). For dendritic spine quantification, confocal microscopy images were analyzed using Neurolucida 360 software with Autospine to measure spine density in apical and basal dendrites of hippocampus CA1 pyramidal cells and their secondary branches using an approach previously described (Dickstein et al, ; Rodriguez, Ehlenberger, Dickstein, Hof, & Wearne, ). Dendritic spines were sampled from proximal and distal dendrites, in both primary and secondary branches by an investigator who was blinded to the treatment group of the animals.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Images of 40 μm‐thick sections were acquired, with z‐step 0.25 μm, using a 60x oil immersion objective (numerical aperture 1.4; pixel size, 0.23 x 0.23 μm) as described in our previous study (Gisabella et al, ). For dendritic spine quantification, confocal microscopy images were analyzed using Neurolucida 360 software with Autospine to measure spine density in apical and basal dendrites of hippocampus CA1 pyramidal cells and their secondary branches using an approach previously described (Dickstein et al, ; Rodriguez, Ehlenberger, Dickstein, Hof, & Wearne, ). Dendritic spines were sampled from proximal and distal dendrites, in both primary and secondary branches by an investigator who was blinded to the treatment group of the animals.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Z-stack images at 0.1μm intervals were acquired in the molecular layer of the dentate gyrus under a 63x oil objective with a five-time digital zoom (pixel size = 57.21nm, NA = 1.44, resolution = 512x512, frame average = 4) and were then deconvolved using Autoquant software (RRID:SCR_002465). Z-stacks of dendritic fragments were then visualized in three dimensions using Neurolucida 360 (RRID:SCR_001775) [44], 10μm dendritic fragments were randomly selected for spine counting (no more than one fragment per dendrite) and analyzed by a blinded experimenter. To avoid underestimation of the spine PLOS ONE density that could be due to spherical aberrations over the Z axis, spine counts were expressed relative to fragment lengths [45].…”
Section: Neuronal Morphological Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Images of dendritic spines were captured and analyzed as previously described (51). The investigator was blinded to treatment group.…”
Section: Iontophoretic Dye Injection Neuronal Imaging 3-dimensionalmentioning
confidence: 99%