2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2019.01.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic design of hybrid stochastic local search algorithms for permutation flowshop problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This outline also defines the ways the algorithmic components can be combined. The implementation itself is done in the EMILI framework [71], which aims at a flexible combination of algorithm components that makes it particularly amenable to automatic configuration.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This outline also defines the ways the algorithmic components can be combined. The implementation itself is done in the EMILI framework [71], which aims at a flexible combination of algorithm components that makes it particularly amenable to automatic configuration.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned above, we implemented the SA components within the EMILI framework [71]. As the automatic algorithm configuration tool we use irace [76,19], which is an R implementation of the Iterated Racing algorithm [77,78].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have also experimentally demonstrated the potential of this new approach on three well-known combinatorial optimization problems, such as quadratic assignment problem and two variants of the permutation flow shop problem. Pagnozzi and Stützle [12] presented an automatic design of hybrid SLS algorithms for permutation flowshop problems (PFSP). Here, they automatically generated a new state-of-the-art algorithm for some of the most widely studied variants of the PFSP.…”
Section: Automatic Configuration Of Sls Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A lot of work related to algorithm engineering has been done by research community with regard on automatic algorithm configuration and parameter tuning techniques. Examples of these include ParamILS algorithm introduced by Hutter et al [8], automated algorithms configuration and parameter tuning presented by Hoos in [9], automatic design of hybrid SLS algorithms by Marmion et al, [10], grammar-based generation of SLS heuristics by Mascia et al [11], permutation flowshop problems by Pagnozzi and Stützle [12], algorithm comparison by automatically configurable SLS frameworks by Mascia et al, [13], revisiting simulated annealing by Franzin and Stützle [14]. On the other side, Franzin et al, [15] studied the effect of transformations for numerical parameters, Franzin and Stützle [16] performed comparison of acceptance criteria in randomized local searches, Mu et al, [17] conducted a research on the impact of automated algorithm configuration etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, allowing hybridization can generate huge parameter spaces and generate algorithms with a complex, nested structure. For instance, the grammar based approach used in Pagnozzi and Stützle (2019) for the permutation flowshop problem with the makespan objective had 502 parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%