2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.01.054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic detection and classification of protruding lesions in wireless capsule endoscopy images based on a deep convolutional neural network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
97
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
97
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To detect protruding lesions and classify them into polyps, nodules, epithelial tumors, submucosal tumors, and venous structures, Saito et al developed a CNN model using 30,584 CE images from 292 patients. 31 When this CNN model ana- SB abnormal images included inflammation, ulcer, polyps, lymphangiectasia, bleeding, vascular disease, protruding lesion, lymphatic follicular hyperplasia, diverticulum, parasite, and other.…”
Section: Application Of Artificial Intelligence In Capsule Endoscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To detect protruding lesions and classify them into polyps, nodules, epithelial tumors, submucosal tumors, and venous structures, Saito et al developed a CNN model using 30,584 CE images from 292 patients. 31 When this CNN model ana- SB abnormal images included inflammation, ulcer, polyps, lymphangiectasia, bleeding, vascular disease, protruding lesion, lymphatic follicular hyperplasia, diverticulum, parasite, and other.…”
Section: Application Of Artificial Intelligence In Capsule Endoscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To detect protruding lesions and classify them into polyps, nodules, epithelial tumors, submucosal tumors, and venous structures, Saito et al developed a CNN model using 30,584 CE images from 292 patients [ 31 ]. When this CNN model analyzed 17,507 test images (including 7,507 images of protruding lesions from 73 patients), the AUROC was 0.91 and the sensitivity and specificity were 90.7% and 79.8%, respectively.…”
Section: Artificial Intelligence In Capsule Endoscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies based on still frames have demonstrated the high diagnostic performances of handcrafted computerized algorithms at assessing SBCE cleanliness [11,13]. It has since been demonstrated that NN-based algorithms can significantly reduce the reading time of SBCE [7][8][9]14], but they have not been used yet to rate SB cleanliness. Our work demonstrates a valuable tool for better standardization and quality reporting in CE…”
Section: Accepted M Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensitivity and specificity of the convolutional neural network were 90.7% (95% confidence interval, 90.0%-91.4%) and 79.8% (95% confidence interval, 79.0%-80.6%). 8 This study has several strengths. To our knowledge, it is the first of its kind to specifically evaluate the role of computer-aided detection of polypoid lesions in the small bowel; in addition, the authors show the beginnings of accurate in-situ computer-aided diagnosis during CE, although the concordance of diagnosis between the AI algorithm and the expert endoscopist reader varied greatly depending on the lesion type, with a 42% concordance for polyps and an 82% to 83% concordance for nodules and epithelial tumors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Copyright ÂȘ 2020 by the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 0016-5107/$36.00 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2020.03.3851 (or measurable efficiency benefits for physicians). In any case, the study by Saito et al 8 is a necessary first step along this path.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%