2023
DOI: 10.1029/2023sw003498
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic Detection and Classification of Spread‐F From Ionosonde at Hainan With Image‐Based Deep Learning Method

Zheng Wang,
Meiyi Zhan,
Pengdong Gao
et al.

Abstract: An intelligent Spread‐F image detection and classification method is presented in this paper based on an ionogram image set using deep learning models. The ionogram images from the Hainan station, spanning from 2002 to 2015, have been manually labeled into five categories, resulting in a unique ionogram image set for supervised learning models. To balance the number of different types, simulated noises were added to these images. Based on 80,000 samples with Spread‐F and 20,000 samples without, numerous experi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 53 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 3 presents an example of a confusion matrix for the evaluation of ConvGRU models with six blocks and a kernel size of 7*7 (referred to as 6‐blocks 7*7, as depicted in Tables 4 and 6), based on data solely from the year 2016 (not included in the training data). The classification results of authentic ionograms of 2016 by a deep learning method (Wang et al., 2023) are taken as the Ground Truth (GT) values. The values in each column, except “ALL,” are the classification results of the second predicted ionograms by our method using the same deep learning method.…”
Section: Training Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 3 presents an example of a confusion matrix for the evaluation of ConvGRU models with six blocks and a kernel size of 7*7 (referred to as 6‐blocks 7*7, as depicted in Tables 4 and 6), based on data solely from the year 2016 (not included in the training data). The classification results of authentic ionograms of 2016 by a deep learning method (Wang et al., 2023) are taken as the Ground Truth (GT) values. The values in each column, except “ALL,” are the classification results of the second predicted ionograms by our method using the same deep learning method.…”
Section: Training Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%