2010
DOI: 10.1117/12.844340
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic detection and measurement of femur length from fetal ultrasonography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…One study assessed automated analysis of fetal brain morphology on standard cranial ultrasound sections to estimate the gestational age in second and third trimester fetuses, compared with standard fetal biometry using a CNN with supervised learning based on previously labeled images 58 . Five studies assessed deep learning for automated measurement of the FL only 59–63 and two studies assessed automated measurement of AC only 64,65 . There were four studies assessing correct detection of the fetal abdominal standard plane (FASP) using AI 66–69 and five studies assessed various combinations of two or more fetal biometry measurements 70–74 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One study assessed automated analysis of fetal brain morphology on standard cranial ultrasound sections to estimate the gestational age in second and third trimester fetuses, compared with standard fetal biometry using a CNN with supervised learning based on previously labeled images 58 . Five studies assessed deep learning for automated measurement of the FL only 59–63 and two studies assessed automated measurement of AC only 64,65 . There were four studies assessing correct detection of the fetal abdominal standard plane (FASP) using AI 66–69 and five studies assessed various combinations of two or more fetal biometry measurements 70–74 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional Image Processing methods (Chakkarwar, Joshi & Revankar, 2010;Wee et al, 2010;Rawat et al, 2013;Ibrahim et al,2017;Lu et al, 2005;Satwika et al, 2013;Foi et al, 2014;Sahili et al, 2019;Rasheed et al, 2021;Thomas, Peters & Jeanty, 1991;Mukherjee et al, 2010;Wang, 2014;Methews & Deepa, 2014;Khan et al, 2015;Yu, Wang & Chen, 2015;Amoah, Anto & Crimi, 2015;Ravishankar, Prabhu & Vaidya, 2016;Hermawati et al, 2019;Yu et al, 2008;Wang et al, 2014;Jang et al, 2018;Kim et al, 2018;Nirmala & Palanisami, 2010;Lakshmi et al, 2008;Karl, Kagan & Chaoui, 2012;Sonia & Shanti, 2015;Deng et al, 2012;Anzalone et al, 2013;Sonia & Shanti, 2016;Nie et al, 2017) Supervised Learning methods (Khazendar et al, 2014;Ibrahim et al, 2017;Lu et al, 2005;Sahli et al, 2019;Carneiro et al, 2008;Anjit & Rishidas, 2011;Rafeek & Gunasundari, 2013;Deng et al, 2012;Park et al, 2013;Sciortino, Tegolo & Valenti, 2017) Unsupervised Learning methods…”
Section: Classification Of Existing Studies According To the Techniqu...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was noted by the authors that automatic measurement of the gestational sac was successfully performed with the presented method. Mukherjee et al (2010) used polynomial curve fitting technique for automatic FL detection and measurement. Otsu threshold and curvature-based thresholding procedures were used to differentiate the femur, from other regions.…”
Section: Traditional Image Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the fetal movement tracing acquired by actography, Ostu method [17,18] is used to set a threshold automatically to distinguish the fetal movement parts from background noises. The parts above threshold are considered as fetal movement, and the rest are background noises.…”
Section: Fetal Movement Recognition From Actographymentioning
confidence: 99%