2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-45656-0_25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic Detection and Segmentation of Brain Tumor Using Random Forest Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Segmentations are shown in Figure 10. Classification results can be further improved by using preprocessed data instead of raw data, and by means of postprocessing to remove the outlying voxels and inlying holes as demonstrated in Reference [16]. Lastly, the performance of the RF classifier trained on all tumor cores of the 20 real high-grade glioma volumes using the 3D Slicer extension were compared to similar studies performed on the BraTS dataset.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Segmentations are shown in Figure 10. Classification results can be further improved by using preprocessed data instead of raw data, and by means of postprocessing to remove the outlying voxels and inlying holes as demonstrated in Reference [16]. Lastly, the performance of the RF classifier trained on all tumor cores of the 20 real high-grade glioma volumes using the 3D Slicer extension were compared to similar studies performed on the BraTS dataset.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approach DICE This paper RF 0.43 Geremia [21] Spatial decision forests with intrinsic hierarchy 0.32 Kapás [16] RF 0.58 Bauer [22] Integrated hierarchical RF 0.48 Zikic [23] Context-sensitive features with a decision tree ensemble 0.47 Festa [24] RF using neighborhood and local context features 0.50…”
Section: Papermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique classifies the brain MRI as normal (no tumor or benign) or abnormal (malign) in an efficient way. Zolt´an Kap´as et al [11] presents preliminary results (detection and localization of tumors in MRI volumes) obtained using the random forest technique. Keeping three goals in mind, that is, Histogram normalization, feature computation and missing data, pre-processing has been carried out.…”
Section: Decision Treementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The unsupervised model, such as fuzzy c-means [ 19 ], k-means [ 20 ], and principal component analysis (PCA) [ 21 , 22 ], do not need a training procedure. The supervised model, such as random forest (RF) [ 23 ], markov random field [ 24 ], support vector machine (SVM) [ 25 ], extreme learning machine [ 26 ] and deep learning [ 7 ], need to first train a classification or segmentation model, then feed a new acquired MRI into the trained network to obtain a segmented contour of the brain image. A late example is by Yang et al where PCA feature extraction is conducted, they are able to diagnose breast tumors by using SVM with differential evolution-based parameter tuning [ 22 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%