2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.patrec.2013.11.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic detection of auditory salience with optimized linear filters derived from human annotation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
38
1
Order By: Relevance
“…19 The current dataset supports this intuitive notion. Figure 5(a) (inset) shows a significant increase in loudness preceding an event, calculated as the average loudness within 0.5 s before an event minus the average loudness between 2.0 and 1.5 s before the event [tð232Þ ¼ 11:6; p ( 0:001].…”
Section: B Acoustic Featuressupporting
confidence: 68%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…19 The current dataset supports this intuitive notion. Figure 5(a) (inset) shows a significant increase in loudness preceding an event, calculated as the average loudness within 0.5 s before an event minus the average loudness between 2.0 and 1.5 s before the event [tð232Þ ¼ 11:6; p ( 0:001].…”
Section: B Acoustic Featuressupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The first comparison uses the Kayser et al model 15 which calculates salience using a center-surround mechanism based on models of visual salience. The second is a model by Kim et al, 19 which calculates salient periods using a linear salience filter and linear discriminant analysis on loudness. The third is a model by Kaya et al, 18 which detects deviants in acoustic features using a predictive tracking model using a Kalman filter.…”
Section: F Event Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations