2017
DOI: 10.1111/echo.13587
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic detection of end‐diastolic and end‐systolic frames in 2D echocardiography

Abstract: An automated algorithm can identify the end-systolic and end-diastolic frames with performance indistinguishable from that of human experts. This saves staff time, which could therefore be invested in assessing more beats, and reduces uncertainty about the reliability of the choice of frame.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper, we proposed a method to solve the ES and ED frame detection problem directly, without the need for LV segmentation. We reported results that were within interobserver variability error for detecting ED and ES frames (i.e., median disagreement of 3 frames [4]). We demonstrated the performance of several deep learning architectures, based on the combination of state-of-the-art CNN and RNN modules, and evaluated these architectures on a large dataset of echocardiography cine series.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this paper, we proposed a method to solve the ES and ED frame detection problem directly, without the need for LV segmentation. We reported results that were within interobserver variability error for detecting ED and ES frames (i.e., median disagreement of 3 frames [4]). We demonstrated the performance of several deep learning architectures, based on the combination of state-of-the-art CNN and RNN modules, and evaluated these architectures on a large dataset of echocardiography cine series.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information. Recently, Zolgharni et al [4] demonstrated that the median disagreement between five sonographers for the identification of ED and ES phases is 3 frames.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their method allows analysis of potentially useful indices of left ventricle ejection/filling parameters. A recent study by Zolgharni [16] concluded that the speckle tracking by the development toolbox, which relies on the block matching algorithm is an efficient method for end‐diastole and end‐systole frames determination in 2D echocardiography sequences. One research [17] suggested three methods for estimation of the end‐diastole frame.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the segmentation‐based approaches, end‐diastole and end‐systolic frames are characterised by the assumption that the most significant and smallest left ventricle segmented cross‐sections in a cardiac cycle correspond to the end‐systole and end‐diastole frames. In clinical practice, the end‐diastolic and end‐systolic frames are manually determined by using the R‐wave and T‐wave detection in the ECG signal, respectively [16]. The detection of the R‐peaks localisation in the noisy signal by using the Hilbert transform combined with a threshold technique was proposed in [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several models have received extensive attention in the ultrasound engineering community, such as block matching (BM) [20][21][22][23], optical flow [24][25][26], elastic registration [27,28], and machine learning models [29,30]. The most computationally efficient method of quantifying tissue motion on ultrasound is BM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%