1999
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-46846-3_22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic Detection of Geomagnetic Sudden Commencement Using Lifting Wavelet Filters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since then, the working procedure to detect SSC and Sfe events has been more or less the same and it is still based on manual methods. Recently, many attempts to automatize the detection of sudden commencements (SC) have succeeded using different approaches, e.g., neural networks (Segarra and Curto, 2013), wavelet filters (Takano et al, 1999) and time-frequency clusters (Hafez and Ghamry, 2011). The key factor in the successful automatic detection of SSC was probably the fact that they mostly have a common morphological pattern: the main signal, a sudden increase in the H component, is similar around the world.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, the working procedure to detect SSC and Sfe events has been more or less the same and it is still based on manual methods. Recently, many attempts to automatize the detection of sudden commencements (SC) have succeeded using different approaches, e.g., neural networks (Segarra and Curto, 2013), wavelet filters (Takano et al, 1999) and time-frequency clusters (Hafez and Ghamry, 2011). The key factor in the successful automatic detection of SSC was probably the fact that they mostly have a common morphological pattern: the main signal, a sudden increase in the H component, is similar around the world.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem has been tackled many times before (Hafez and Ghamry 2011;Joselyn 1985;Mendes et al 2005;Shinohara et al 2005;Takano et al 1999), most recently and extensively by Hafez et al (2013a), where methods were developed for automated SSC detection in real-time geomagnetic observatory data with very promising results. These methods naturally have their limitations; the earlier studies used 1-min data, which do not have high enough resolution for very detailed or rapid detection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are some authors interested in an automatic detection of SC (for example, Takano et al, 1999;Shinohara et al, 2005;or Hafez and Ghamry, 2011). Generally, they excluded from their data set the events with small amplitude and they focused their detection system in the amplitude and onset time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%