2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.bspc.2021.103122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic detection of poor quality signals as a pre-processing scheme in the analysis of sEMG in swallowing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this sense, several proposals offer filtering methods to improve the signal quality [2], [3]. However, since, in many cases, the quality of the signals is not optimal [4], it is necessary to use more than one feature to describe them. On the other hand, the choice of features to describe the signal directly influences the classification quality [5].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sense, several proposals offer filtering methods to improve the signal quality [2], [3]. However, since, in many cases, the quality of the signals is not optimal [4], it is necessary to use more than one feature to describe them. On the other hand, the choice of features to describe the signal directly influences the classification quality [5].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cuadros-Acosta et al [86] explored machine learning methods to assess the quality of EMG collected from the neck and jaw muscles for the purpose of assessing dysphagia. EMG segments were labeled as either good quality or bad quality.…”
Section: Single Channel Emgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SVM, k-nearest neighbours, and random forest models all achieved classification accuracies of over 97%. The authors recommended the use of a random forest classifier trained on three features (two power spectrum-derived features, and the mean of the RMS envelope [86]) to preserve computational efficiency.…”
Section: Single Channel Emgmentioning
confidence: 99%