2016 Sixth International Conference on Image Processing Theory, Tools and Applications (IPTA) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/ipta.2016.7821031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic detection, tracking and counting of birds in marine video content

Abstract: Abstract-Robust automatic detection of moving objects in a marine context is a multi-faceted problem due to the complexity of the observed scene. The dynamic nature of the sea caused by waves, boat wakes, and weather conditions poses huge challenges for the development of a stable background model. Moreover, camera motion, reflections, lightning and illumination changes may contribute to false detections. Dynamic background subtraction (DBGS) is widely considered as a solution to tackle this issue in the scope… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another improvement over the rangefinder is a fixed field of view that does away with human intervention to point at a flying animal of interest. Thus, one may use a programmable camera for motion detection to automatically trigger the other cameras without being present (T'Jampens et al ., 2016). Rangefinders are difficult to use for small, fast‐moving birds, and likely create inherent biases for close, consistently moving, and larger birds (Desholm et al ., 2006; Harwood et al ., 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another improvement over the rangefinder is a fixed field of view that does away with human intervention to point at a flying animal of interest. Thus, one may use a programmable camera for motion detection to automatically trigger the other cameras without being present (T'Jampens et al ., 2016). Rangefinders are difficult to use for small, fast‐moving birds, and likely create inherent biases for close, consistently moving, and larger birds (Desholm et al ., 2006; Harwood et al ., 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies [ 28 , 29 ] discuss the behavior of birds in the sky and on water, in addition to evaluating different types of classifiers.…”
Section: Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we provide an overview of how deep neural networks can be used to detect every bird inside an image. Examples of similar techniques have been for detection of marine birds from videos [51], tracking of Serengeti wild animals in camera-trap images [52], detection of wild birds using UAV imagery [53], detection of Interior Least Tern in uncontrolled outdoor videos [54]. A deep neural network represents a relatively complex hypothesis function that maps features (e.g., image pixels) to the desired output (e.g., pixel class labels for classification, bounding boxes for detection) by computations in multiple layers.…”
Section: Automated Bird Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%