Proceedings of the 2nd ACM/SPEC International Conference on Performance Engineering 2011
DOI: 10.1145/1958746.1958796
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic estimation of performance requirements for software tasks of mobile devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While Schwarzer et al [44] suggest methods to estimate performance requirements of software tasks using simulation, our approach is based on the observation made by Sherwood et al [45] that a program's execution changes over time in phases. Our work characterizes the GC workload, which is common between all apps, as having a lower CPI compared to the average mutator workload.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While Schwarzer et al [44] suggest methods to estimate performance requirements of software tasks using simulation, our approach is based on the observation made by Sherwood et al [45] that a program's execution changes over time in phases. Our work characterizes the GC workload, which is common between all apps, as having a lower CPI compared to the average mutator workload.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we demonstrate that it is necessary to define GC requirements as a function of system mechanisms such as the governor and scheduling policies. While Schwarzer et al [44] suggest methods to estimate performance requirements of software tasks using simulation, our approach is based on the observation made by Sherwood et al [45] that a program's execution changes over time in phases. Our work characterizes the GC workload, which is common between all apps, as having a lower CPI compared to the average mutator workload.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%