2013 IEEE 15th International Conference on E-Health Networking, Applications and Services (Healthcom 2013) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/healthcom.2013.6720745
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic fall detection: Complementary devices for a better fall monitoring coverage

Abstract: Falling, and the fear of falling, are physical and psychological phenomenons that affect the quality of life and the autonomy of older people. One solution to address this problem is the use of automatic fall detectors able to immediately trigger emergency responses. Mobile Telecare devices cover outdoor and indoor activities. However it is recognized that such devices are not suitable nor used while taking a shower. Therefore in this paper we present two complementary automatic fall detectors: a mobile Teleca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the inherent difficulties of testing a FDS with actual body falls (especially falls of older people), only a reduced number of works have examined the effectiveness of a FDS with real-world falls. In [ 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 ] a small group of older people (from 3 to 20 persons) were tracked during some weeks to check the accuracy of the proposed FDS. In all cases, very few falls (or even no falls) occurred during the monitoring period, so just the capacity of the system to avoid false alarms could be actually assessed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the inherent difficulties of testing a FDS with actual body falls (especially falls of older people), only a reduced number of works have examined the effectiveness of a FDS with real-world falls. In [ 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 ] a small group of older people (from 3 to 20 persons) were tracked during some weeks to check the accuracy of the proposed FDS. In all cases, very few falls (or even no falls) occurred during the monitoring period, so just the capacity of the system to avoid false alarms could be actually assessed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%