2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-021-09037-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic flood detection using sentinel-1 images on the google earth engine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
20
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
3
20
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In many studies, Sentinel 1 (SAR) was demonstrated suitable for mapping flood areas due to its ability to penetrate cloud forms among others. This result are in line and supports the findings of previously conducted researches (Uddin et al 2019;Moharrami et al 2021). Uddin et al, (2019) concluded that GEE algorithm performs well with an optimum accuracy of 96.44%.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In many studies, Sentinel 1 (SAR) was demonstrated suitable for mapping flood areas due to its ability to penetrate cloud forms among others. This result are in line and supports the findings of previously conducted researches (Uddin et al 2019;Moharrami et al 2021). Uddin et al, (2019) concluded that GEE algorithm performs well with an optimum accuracy of 96.44%.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Uddin et al, (2019) concluded that GEE algorithm performs well with an optimum accuracy of 96.44%. Moharrami et al (2021) monitored flood events using multi-temporal Sentinel 1 images. The accuracy ranges from 92.8%-96.2% with an overall accuracy higher than 90%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the automated Otsu thresholding approach (Otsu, 1979) that finds optimum threshold values based on clusters found in the histograms of pixel values. This method is particularly useful for detecting inundated areas, because water bodies have considerably lower backscatter values compared to other land cover classes in a SAR image (Borah et al., 2018; Donchyts et al., 2016; Moharrami et al., 2021; Tiwari et al., 2020). The Otsu method assumes that there is a clear distinction between the two classes of interest in a bimodal histogram of the radar backscattering values, which is a valid assumption in this study (Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors in [5] tried to improve histogram thresholding using bilateral filtering as a smooth labelling method and tested the approach on three European events. The authors in [6] used the Otsu iterative thresholding algorithm applied to Sentinel-1 GDR data with single VV (vertical transmit-vertical receive) polarisation. Another approach is mentioned in [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The developed system was closely linked to other existing structures in the USA, such as the United States Geological Survey, a network of gauge stations, etc. Some other solutions, e.g., [6][7][8][9][10][11]13,14,17,18,24,26], relied on the use of computational intelligence tools, indexes and thresholding, or on specific auxiliary data sets. The computational intelligence tools used, such as neural networks, must always be trained on sample data first and only afterwards can be used to evaluate the current situation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%