The diffusion of video‐surveillance systems and increase of crimes more and more often requires the identification of represented subjects by anthropological techniques. Traditional methods for identifying human faces consist of the evaluation of morphological traits, anthropometric traits (indices, angles, etc.), and superimposition of two images (faces). The first two do not seem to be sufficient for juridical purposes. Recent technology allows us, however, to advance in a very difficult field by suggesting methods of superimposing 2D and 3D images, which may facilitate the comparison of facial traits. When the face (or ears—another highly distinctive anatomical structure) cannot be studied, details useful for verifying the exclusion of a suspect or a mere compatibility can be gait analysis and height determination of the represented subject, once again aided by new technology.