2010 20th International Conference on Pattern Recognition 2010
DOI: 10.1109/icpr.2010.285
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic Gender Recognition Using Fusion of Facial Strips

Abstract: We propose a fully automatic system that detects and normalizes faces in images and recognizes their genders. To boost the recognition accuracy, we correct the in-plane and out-of-plane rotations of faces, and align faces based on estimated eye positions. To perform gender recognition, a face is first decomposed into several horizontal and vertical strips. Then, a regression function for each strip gives an estimation of the likelihood the strip sample belongs to a specific gender. The likelihoods from all str… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To further validate our method, we compare the accuracy of our method to 8 other state-of-the-art methods with an evaluation of their respective limitations, detailed in Table 1. The accuracy of the proposed method is only slightly lower than [14] and [15] on the FERET database and [13] on the LFW database, but outperforms the others in comparison. However it should be noted that [14] used both fa and fb subsets of the FERET database containing replication of most subjects, while [15] used a large number of classifiers and did not specify the evaluation method.…”
Section: ) Gmm Component Numbermentioning
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…To further validate our method, we compare the accuracy of our method to 8 other state-of-the-art methods with an evaluation of their respective limitations, detailed in Table 1. The accuracy of the proposed method is only slightly lower than [14] and [15] on the FERET database and [13] on the LFW database, but outperforms the others in comparison. However it should be noted that [14] used both fa and fb subsets of the FERET database containing replication of most subjects, while [15] used a large number of classifiers and did not specify the evaluation method.…”
Section: ) Gmm Component Numbermentioning
confidence: 88%
“…one may experience a drop in classification rates as much as 6% [15]. In addition, applying histogram equalisation is a common pre-processing procedure that may increase classification rate.…”
Section: ) Gmm Component Numbermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To guarantee the accurate signal of a single modality system, the fusion of two or more signals is significant to improve the performance of the system [39,[41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48]. To achieve robust and discriminative performance for gender recognition, a fusion of EMG and HRV [40,41,49] is proposed before feeding into the interface system in order to control the level of MR valve stiffness of the stepper before the rehabilitation exercise can be emulated [40,41].…”
Section: Workmentioning
confidence: 99%