2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.artint.2019.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic generation of sentimental texts via mixture adversarial networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, gene-wise expression states were first inferred by the left truncated mixture Gaussian model. Modules of genes that show consistent activated or suppressed expression in a subset of cells were identified using a non-negative matrix factorization method namely MEBF [ 65 ]. We further evaluated the enrichment of the genes in each module against known targets of transcriptional regulatory factors, and the association of the cells of each module with the experimental conditions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, gene-wise expression states were first inferred by the left truncated mixture Gaussian model. Modules of genes that show consistent activated or suppressed expression in a subset of cells were identified using a non-negative matrix factorization method namely MEBF [ 65 ]. We further evaluated the enrichment of the genes in each module against known targets of transcriptional regulatory factors, and the association of the cells of each module with the experimental conditions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Models for Emotional Dialogs Previous work on emotional dialogs fall into three categories: (1) controlled emotional dialog generation , Colombo et al, 2019, Song et al, 2019, (Zhou and Wang, 2018 1. The two large-scale automatic annotated dataset NLPCC2017 and MOJITALK (Zhou and Wang, 2018) and the manually labeled dataset DailyDialog (Li et al, 2017) are widely used for controlled emotional dialog generation , Zhou and Wang, 2018, Wang and Wan, 2019, Shen and Feng, 2020. The Empatheticdialog (Rashkin et al, 2019) dataset is designed for training empathetic dialog models (Lin et al, 2019, Majumder et al, 2020, Li et al, 2020a.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When added to the original set of training data, such kinds of counterfactually augmented data (CAD) have shown their benefits on learning real causal associations and improving the model robustness in recent studies (Kaushik et al, 2020(Kaushik et al, , 2021Wang and Culotta, 2021). Unlike gradient-based adversarial examples (Wang and Wan, 2019;Zang et al, 2020), which cannot provide a clear boundary between positive and negative instances to humans, counterfactuals could provide "human-like" logic to show a modification to the arXiv:2106.15231v2 [cs.CL] 30 Jun 2021 input that makes a difference to the output classification (Byrne, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%